• Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “This actually caused some annoyance among law enforcement officials who believed they had suspects’ phones stored in a readable state, only to find they were rebooting and becoming harder to access due to this feature.”

    I love it.

  • oldfart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good security feature but only for the phone in your pocket. The old one used as a camera, homeassistant screen, sms to email forwarder, ssh server, will stop being useful.

      • pfkninenines@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        On the 9to5Google article it says

        Update 4/16: Google has updated the changelog entry to add that auto-reboot is “optional” when it comes in the “future.” This addresses some concern from people who run continuous Android devices, with tablets somewhat fitting into that.

    • hefty4871@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The old one isn’t getting any updates and won’t see this change.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I like it but, why so long? If I haven’t unlocked my phone in 24 hours I’m either dead of hospitalized, 3 days seems super extreme.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      or maybe, I have replaced it with a newer phone, and repurposed it as some sort of lightweight server or something. So it doesn’t get unlocked anymore, ever

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      3 days seems like a good “default” but I agree I’d definitely like the option to make it shorter.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    That’s good, if I don’t unlock my phone for 3 days, either the phone is lost or I’m dead.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The latest Google update will make your phone more secure if you don’t touch it…

    Fuck entirely off. The last time my phone surprised me with an update, it was ads on my goddamn lock screen.

    • kalipixel@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Google itself as of this moment never did put adds on a lock screen, it is the manufacturer or third party apps who can do it. Some Realme and Xiaomi phones do it afaik and probably some other brands.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Oh sure, Google only fucks with how texting works, whether my car GPS cooperates, what the entire UI looks like…

        I know this specific abuse was not Google’s fault specifically. But it’s the same god damn thing. Nobody asked me if I wanted that. They just shoved it onto the machine I paid to own and pay to use, like it’s not mine enough to deserve respect, let alone control.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s Metro’s fault.

        I fucking hate that three separate skeezebag companies have free reign to insert software on my extremely personal wireless pocket computer.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You want to do this even with custom roms.

      Having your phone automatically go into the BFU state ensures that there’s only a small window for a thief to extract data from your phone.

      If you ever think your phone is about to be stolen or seized you want to power it off for this exact reason.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They’re saying custom ROMs like Grapheneos have had this for a long time already.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          I read it as “This is a silly Android thing that I don’t have to deal with because I use custom roms”.

          I use Graphene and use this feature, but I can understand why it would seem silly to some people and I can think of use cases where you wouldn’t want it to happen (like using your phone as a security device with Haven (https://github.com/guardianproject/haven)) installed.

          Most Android users don’t understand the BFU/AFU states and the security implications, it is good that default android is including a sane security default that’ll be pushed out to the standard Android users.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It is not enough to lock the phone.

          An advanced attacker that has access to forensic imaging tools can pull data off of your phone as long as it has been unlocked the first time after boot.

          There are some models and some OSs (like Graphene on the newest Pixels) that are safe, for the time being, in AFU mode. You still want to power the phone off if you have the chance.

          In your friend’s situation, his phone can be powered, isolated from RF to prevent remote wiping and kept in a lock state in order to preserve the keys in memory until an exploit is found for that model. If the OS automatically reboots after 3 days, it prevents this kind of attack.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    i think samsungs already do this. as long as i can turn it off if i ever need to.

    a charging limit would also be nice.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pixels can be configured to limit charging to 80% these days.

      I’ve started using it and the difference between using 80% and 100% on a daily basis is negligible, I rarely if ever let my device go below about 35% anyway. So this change is basically free battery life for the device

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Samsung have a setting to set the charger to only charge to a certain amount over night

      So if you plug it in at 1800 at 0230 or whatever it won’t be charging until just it calculates that it will be full charged when you wake up