Yes

If it is a different team, why wouldn’t you just say that’s your recommendation? Your story isn’t making sense

I don’t know what is happening any more

If this is for work you probably should bring in a professional. There are enterprise solutions for this.

This is selfhosted after all

I think you can buy an adapter

The web interface is based on bitwarden. You are thinking of the client api.

https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden

The web interface is from bitwarden. Technically they could fork it but that would be much more work.

They don’t make any money off of the open source version. It is just a matter of the before they “discontinue” the open source version and move to source available.

If you have any doubts just look at Redis, Vagrant or Terraform

Vaultwarden still depends on upstream bitwarden

It is effectively going closed source

Honesty this might be the best option if they need Windows stuff.

Ubuntu Gnome is awful in so many ways

Also gnome is not Apple like at all

There are far better options than Ubuntu at this point.

I would go with something else personally

You do realize how expensive hardware is right?

Installing software is the same as side loading. That’s literally what it means

Smells very authoritarian

Whenever I heard about Iran my mind immediately goes to Tor. (You can run TCP over it) I’m sure there are better options but Tor is certainly the most robust.

I’m not sure it is censorship resistant

Source?

Ah, that makes sense

Side note: you don’t need multiple ports to have multiple subnets. (You can just use vlans)