This toggle is annoying because what was once 1 press to turn on BT is now 2. It gets me every day.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Same bullshit they did when they combined WiFi and Cell into one toggle and called it “internet”.

    Like DO YOU PEOPLE JUST NOT UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THIS MENU YOU YOURSELVES CREATED!?

    • Uriel_Copy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hated that too, but buried in the’edit’ list I still found separate toggles for WiFi and data (on Lineage OS)

        • Uriel_Copy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          When you edit your quick-access tiles. Mine has a little pencil if I expand the notification area fully. I have these choices, where ‘Internet’ is the annoying combined WiFi/data button, but the other two were in there and I just had to drag them out instead.

          scteenshot

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      What’s even more infuriating is that the panel is blue even if both wifi and cell network are tuned off!

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I would turn your yelling around: Do you honestly believe the vast majority of users need more than just that functionality, which beelines you into connecting to a specific Wi-Fi over toggling anything on or off?

      Much like the Bluetooth menu, these changes are driven by the fact that the vast vast majority of users only ever need to access a quick “connect to this BT device” or “I want to connect to this Wi-Fi” menu. Never anything else.

      It sucks as a power user, but at least for me I could find individual toggles when editing the quick panel.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Do you honestly believe the vast majority of users need

        If users don’t need it, then why was it created in the first place? Of course they need it.

        If you want to change networks or Bluetooth devices, that’s what the setting menu is for. This is called a “quick toggle” because it’s intended to quickly toggle connections on and off.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          So now what would you do if the data were to show that the vast majority need fast access to a menu to swap which BT device is connected, but only few ever turn it on or off?

          Wouldn’t it make sense to have the connect menu available quickly, and the on/off deeper in the configuration, just like you say it but the other way around?

          Of course, 10+ versions ago the devs expected the toggle to be used frequently. But unless our users are a very skewed sample, fucking nobody (if you round it) ever does. Same with toggling data.

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a major improvement. Nobody turns off Bluetooth.

      It’s now easier to check or disconnect devices.

  • asciimage@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like the way Nothing OS does it. Tapping the icon toggles Bluetooth on/off, and tapping the text/rest of the button opens the popup.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can we talk about how space inefficient the UI is? It takes up the entire screen to essentially show 6 buttons. And I bet like the Internet toggle that it moves the buttons around when it detects new networks

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s actually 9 buttons + DONE button. Each device has the option to connect to it by clicking its name, or enter Settings by tapping on its gear icon.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think Android 12 is where this was introduced, and 13 where they made the buttons even bigger

  • Keith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have the opposite. I have never a reason to turn off Bluetooth, but always want to connect of disconnect devices. this is so much better than long pressing.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah they built this UI on the assumption that people didn’t turn off their BT generally. This is an improvement for me but I really don’t see why they can’t make it an option for people.

      • evo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not an assumption. They obviously have telemetry that shows the vast majority of people never turn Bluetooth or WiFi off.

        • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          …or maybe the people who turn off Bluetooth also tend to disable/block telemetry.

          • StarPupil@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            And that group is also an incredibly small outlier, and wouldn’t be considered in their calculations.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I don’t turn that off generally either but you’re right the wifi panel has been like this for a bit and now it’s consistent.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      My wife’s car is extremely aggressive. The second she turns it on, it steals my Bluetooth connection. I could be mowing my lawn, listening to music on my phone, then suddenly hear nothing, and it’s because my wife got in her car and was suddenly blasted with my tunes.

      I tell my phone to forget her car’s Bluetooth connection, but then I’m constantly harassed by pop-ups on my phone every minute saying her car wants to pair with my phone. I can’t get it to stop pinging me. It sees a Bluetooth device in range and then spams it, trying to connect.

      So yes, I like to keep my Bluetooth off until I want to use it.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Our car does this as well, but then when I get in it sometimes just refuses to connect automatically, so this actually helps me immensly.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sounds like your phone is top priority. Either clear it off the car or move her’s up to the top spot.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Some cars it doesn’t matter - it will attempt to connect to whatever device it sees.

          If it happens to see his first, it connects.

          I’ve seen these problems for years with integrated BT in cars. I hate it.

          The best answer I’ve found is to pair, then turn off all connectivity within that Bluetooth connection on my phone.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have a dig through the cars Bluetooth settings and see if you can delete the pairing from that end.

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve done that, but it still pings every Bluetooth connection it sees, whether it recognizes it or not.

          Her car had some class-action lawsuit recently because its integrated satellite radio service was constantly pinging for a connection, whether you had the service or not. If the car wasn’t driven in a few days, the battery would be completely drained. And you couldn’t jump it yourself; it had to be towed to a shop so they could use some special machine to jump and charge it.

          That issue has been settled, but now its Bluetooth is basically doing the same thing. Fortunately only while the car is on, but still.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sounds like you need to give it something to connect to. Buy a cheap analog-to Bluetooth transmitter, charge it from the car and just never turn it off. You’d need to do some research to find one which doesn’t go to sleep. If you need to use your phone in the car, just turn the transmitter off.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Hmm. Well that sucks.

            Personally; I refuse to connect a phone to a car via Bluetooth. Too many reports of cars harvesting every available bit of info it can access from the connection and storing/uploading it inaccessible/immovable to the owner.

            Aux cable, fm transmitter, or deal with the radio.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a pain if you share a car. Whoever starts the car gets to interrupt the other one’s phone call.

    • woodenskewer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I turn it off daily. I have 2 phones and I don’t want to connect my personal phone to my BT speaker at work. I can see where you’re coming from though.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t want to connect my personal phone to my BT speaker at work

        I’m confused, do you shuttle the same speaker between work and home or is work a separate speaker? If it’s a separate speaker why don’t you just delete it’s pairing from your personal phone?

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I prefer this. I’ve been annoyed by having to go to the settings every time I wanted to swap device I want to connect to. I rarely turn off BT anyways.

    • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Before it was a single tap to turn Bluetooth on/off, and a tap+hold to open the Bluetooth settings (or any quick setting tile in your notification tray). Maybe you just didn’t know about that feature but the old way was 100% better.

  • lorkano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Going through the comments, I think it’s clear to conclude this should be a choice to configure this tile. Some people prefer single tap to turn off, some don’t

  • macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t want to go conspiracy theory, but in my opinion it feels like a dark pattern to increase the time people have Bluetooth on. I believe they did the same thing with success for Wi-Fi. If I recall correctly, even when you are not connected to a device, Google can estimate your location based on what Wi-Fi networks you are in proximity to and something to varying degrees might work for Bluetooth as well which is why they also roll the feature over to the Bluetooth toggle

      • clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not at all. That’s what people want. Nobody turns off Bluetooth.

        • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not what people want, that’s why this post exists and it has 69 comments so far.

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you wanted that, you’d simply just leave Bluetooth toggled on and take it off your top quick toggles.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then why do I have non-tech people in my life complaining about these toggles within toggles?

          For those that want it always on, they could do so just as easily before the update that adds a layer of obfuscation. This is not about what people want.

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      They already do that regardless of the state of those toggles. You have to turn that off in a different spot.

      The main Bluetooth and Wi-Fi toggles otherwise just stop your device from actively associating/pairing with other devices. They do not control the radios.

    • evo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wut. Why would they bother when your cellular connection is constantly pinging all towers to literally triangulate your location? Why do something much more complicated to get data they already have?

      The real answer is they are a multi billion dollar company with telemetry. Obviously, the vast majority of people never turn off WiFi or Bluetooth. Most people want quick access to connect to a WiFi network or Bluetooth device, not to toggle either off.

      • macattack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I believe that Wi-Fi points are more accurate than towers especially when they’re sharing the information with indoor retailers

      • Vega@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bluetooth give a lot more information about your surrounding (what device your phone detect or connect, for how much time, distance from objects, etc.), not only from your phone alone, but from other people phones who have bluetooth on and e.g. never disable any tracking from google services too. And the Mac address for bluetooth never change, so any device (and tracking company) will know you is forever you. Bluetooth is a privacy nightmare, and this is totally a dark pattern. People not knowing what they’re doing is of course a thing, but it seems just a usual bad practice by google, who like to manipulate especially not tech-savvy people

  • nxdefiant@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t like it, but I like it more than the old way of holding the button down to get to the menu. I do hate that the “see all” menu doesn’t just expand the current menu, it takes you to the old menu. There’s definitely hints of windows95 creeping into Android.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think however this is just based on how the average user interacts with this toggle. Very few users actively turn off their BT, ever, as they have frequent situations where they want their BT to just work immediately.

    OTOH, this means that in some cases, they need to swap which device to connect to, hence opening the menu on the first tap.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was just grumbling about this today. It’s one of those little changes that might help someone, but interrupts a flow that worked well for me.

  • Pixel@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re not wrong, but you just reminded me to setup some Tasker events to manage my BT enabled state.

  • Still@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    my phone does single tap to toggle and tap on the down arrow or longpress for settings page

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    this entire quick actions shade was redesigned either for children or for elders

    the space now used for 4 quick actions could fit 12 quick actions before