• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Modern gaming, why expect anything more?

    Avoid UE5 games, they are all the same. Underperforming messes.

    • stewie410@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m still not convinced the engine is the problem. Maybe it’s not helping, sure, but heavy reliance on upscalers to achieve nominal performance is probably a bigger issue.

      That, and shipping before proper optimization passes is probably more profitable in the short term, so publishers will push for that.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yes, the engine could be used well, but it’s used for it’s out of the box “good” graphics, lighting and such. Which then yes, devs slap on shitty DLSS, frame generation or whatever at the end to reach a somewhat playable framerate (or “framerate number” should I say with the way things are going. Fuck you Nvidia).

        No developers are going to spend ages tweaking the engine to get good performance when people will just buy the game regardless. I’ve yet to see a good performing UE5 game with good fidelity and I probably never will because it’s entirely reliant on TAA as it’s deferred rendering as standard. I hate seeing developers abandoning their own in-house engines just to swap to shitty UE5. I know, I know, it’s all about the money…

        The engine is a plague, as every developer is seemingly moving to it. Chasing “upgraded” graphics that no one asked for. All games consolidating onto one engine is very bad.

        It’s good for movies, bad for games. Give us good raster performance back, no TAA, no upscaling, no frame gen.