In denying the political and social significance of this clearly bigoted move by EA, you are defending bigots. That’s no hallucination. Then again, of course a .ml user would argue in bad faith.
Do you deny that denial of the political and social significance of this political action taken because of bigotry is a defense of bigotry? If so, you are relying on fallacy.
That is a non-answer to my question. I asked if you deny that denial of the political and social significance of this political action taken because of bigotry is a defense of bigotry.
Edit:
The context was @[email protected] providing a non-answer, saying that the removal does not matter much to them. This is not what was asked.
Well, the game is canceled so are you done defending bigotry now?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
In denying the political and social significance of this clearly bigoted move by EA, you are defending bigots. That’s no hallucination. Then again, of course a .ml user would argue in bad faith.
deleted by creator
Do you deny that denial of the political and social significance of this political action taken because of bigotry is a defense of bigotry? If so, you are relying on fallacy.
deleted by creator
That is a non-answer to my question. I asked if you deny that denial of the political and social significance of this political action taken because of bigotry is a defense of bigotry.
Edit:
The context was @[email protected] providing a non-answer, saying that the removal does not matter much to them. This is not what was asked.