• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Thats not what I’m asking. You just have me evidence that they didnt sell it as soon as an EOL date was announced. Are you saying they should have stopped selling it before they publicly announce the EOL? Should they have announced and removed it as soon as the board meeting ended? How much earlier would that be in this case?

    • Kelly@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Should they have announced and removed it as soon as the board meeting ended? How much earlier would that be in this case?

      My unsubstantiated theory is the the licences they signed for all the vehicles and real world content had a 10 year lifetime.

      Usually those contracts would just require that they stop selling the game, but they may have included something about the servers in the contract too.

      Either way they new something was going to change in 2024 and realistically they knew which of these possibilities were viable:

      • sign new deals with all licensors and continue business as usual
      • sign new deals with cooperative licensors and modify the game to remove the others
      • remove the game from sale and keep the servers running for current customers
      • remove the game from sale and kill the servers - tell people to buy the sequal

      I’d they waited until December of 2023 to have that meeting then that feels negligent.

      If they had that meeting earlier and continued to sell the game (until ≈100 days to EOL) without warning customers that feels fraudulent.