Hey all I’m looking for recommendations for a video doorbell that doesn’t need an internet connection.

Preferably something that is WiFi and would work with Frigate?

  • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    unifi has nice (a) doorbell(s). you need a server to record and run the controller though, but that can be a raspberry pi

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t the Ubiquity doorbells require a ‘dream machine’ storage appliance for recording video? I didn’t think there was a way to use your own storage anymore which has been my main hesitation in getting one.

      • Procedure8295@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Cloud key Gen 2 Plus is about $200 and comes with a 2.5 inch 1TB hard drive so it is not that bad if you will have multiple cameras, but maybe not worth it just for one.

        • Toribor@corndog.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s been my problem. It’s overpriced for just a single camera considering I already manage a big storage pool that my other services can use. But do I want to lock myself into buying other Ubiquity IP cams down the road?

      • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        oh, i didn’t know that, as i’m already in to deep in unifi appliances 😬

        i think i remember that it was not required, but i would not be surprised if that has changed.

        consodering that you would need a subscription for a ring doorbell (if i remember correctly) the 200€ for the storage device and the ~180€ for the doorbell would still be cheaper. i’d be surprised to see another alternative with the same features for less money or without a aubscription.

        • doctorzeromd@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ahh got it. My search history says I read the follow up, but not the initial article.

          https://www.theverge.com/23573362/anker-eufy-security-camera-answers-encryption

          That’s ridiculous and unsettling, especially that they claimed it wasn’t possible initially. I wonder if they were not aware that it was possible or whether they were lying. I’m not sure which one is worse.

          I have a eufy doorbell cam, and I’m genuinely very happy with it. Since it’s not actually looking into my home I’m less concerned about this particular security issue. I hope they do better moving forward.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            wonder if they were not aware that it was possible or whether they were lying. I’m not sure which one is worse.

            They knew it was possible,.although it obviously wasn’t intentional.

            The only way this can happen is if they hold copies of the keys used to encrypt/protrect your traffic, and can give them to anyone at any time. Or if there’s no keys at all, and someone simply needs an ID to pull the right stream. Something like your password isn’t required to make the key useful (or they’re storing/using it in a reversible way). And anyone that compromises them can access whatever they want.

            Unfortunately I dont know if anyone that does “cloud” camera stuff, including Reolink (and pretty much all of the other consumer camera makers) are any better here. I’m not sure that they’re as bad, but I bet most are. Clearly providers like Ring are.

  • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have the Aqara G4 doorbell and supposedly it works with WiFi and Frigate (via go2rtc), but I haven’t set up Frigate and I haven’t verified that it fully functions with the internet turned off. It uses Homekit but supposedly will receive Matter via a software update.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    HA Home Assistant automation software
    ~ High Availability
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    NVR Network Video Recorder (generally for CCTV)
    PoE Power over Ethernet

    [Thread #628 for this sub, first seen 26th Mar 2024, 11:55] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

    • Matty_r@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just watched a review. Looks pretty good, they specifically mention Home Assistant as well which is very cool.

      • erte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I also use HA. I’ve been using the Dahua integration in HACS since the Amcrest integration was lacking for the doorbell. Specifically, there was no way to trigger automations when the doorbell is pressed. However, in looking at the documentation I now see a way to monitor via the Amcrest integration. I may give that a go.

  • philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    2N Verso.

    • Works totally offline/Cloud free if required.
    • Can be integrated into any NVR&SIP environment
    • Can easily be used with plausible deniability. “Yeah, officer,I am just using it when someone rings the bell, no recording,the bell system never records,no!”
    • Very sturdy and reliable hardware
    • Offers indoor viewing stations (for the less technically adept household members)
    • PoE based, can be used with LTE in some versions.
    • Good documentation
    • With the automation licence (Costs a bit extra,but is “buy once” at least) basically everything one can imagine automation wise can be achieved, including API calls,etc.
    • Can be extended with RFID, Fingerprint, Bluetooth,Induction loops,etc.

    If you want to use their cloud service you have to pay a small fee,but that’s purely optional and you can easily use your own SIP solution to avoid this. Or simply don’t answer your door from somewhere else.

    The big downside? It’s ridiculously expensive. But I mean…how often does one buy a new doorbell?

  • smeeps@lemmy.mtate.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reolink doorbell is great. Comes in a WiFi or PoE configuration. Can be used with their app with a local NVR, or used as an IP cam into your own NVR.

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    In my experience pretty much all IP cameras phone home in some way at some point, so yeah, you are best off putting them on a separate VLAN and routing appropriately.

    The only brand I’ve had a good experience with is Reolink. I don’t think the quality is appreciably different than a brand like Hikvision and the firmware and support is vastly superior.

    Edit: Some good info on using Reolink cameras with Frigate. I use Blue Iris but would vastly prefer OSS.

  • fraksken@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hikvision if you don’t mind sponsoring chinese govt for the hardware and blocking it from the internet.

    • Matty_r@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, the goal would be that its not accessible externally. And I’m OK with providing footage should they request it - that’s just something you have to accept when owning a security system.

      • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        They can’t request it if you don’t build it. That’s the point. We’ve never needed this security theater before. You don’t need a video camera pointed out towards the public 24/7. Don’t build it and they won’t come.

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t need a video camera pointed out towards the public 24/7.

          Depends on where you live. Being notified of packages at your door is handy before they get stolen.

          And being able to see who knocks on your door is also handy without exposing your eye to the tiny (and glass) peephole.

          As well as being able to see who approaches when you’re not even there.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          “security theater” my guy it’s not x-ray scanning them, it’s so the Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t try and convert me, so when I am taking a shit I can see it’s just the delivery guy and not someone I need to run out with my pants around my ankles, it’s so I can communicate with the neighbors that lock themselves out again asking when I’ll be back from errands.

          Picking a camera vendor that doesn’t give out data like a 2-bit trick isn’t terribly difficult. Not every company is Amazon. Calm down, you’ve been watching way too many cop dramas.