• Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re going to have to give examples, because it reads as a very straightforward statement of facts to me.

    • refract@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      To be fair, this one tells the reader how you should feel:

      No other Linux or FOSS project ever gets this kind of funding. You should be suspicious of it, not celebrate it. You have been tricked into playing defense for millionaires that don’t give a shit about you.

      Could have stopped after the first sentence.

      • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of it being “cheeky” and “looks like propaganda”, you know, the only things you’ve actually said. It looks like a no nonsense list of factual statements to me, what’s so cheeky about that? What about the facts or style of website makes them cheeky? There must be some specific element or combination of elements that make you think that.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Can’t you read? It looks like propaganda and I don’t like the look of it. I cannot recommend this site because of it, because it doesn’t look like something I can take seriously. I am not talking about the facts.

          • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            So what about it looks like propaganda? Why can’t you take it seriously? The font? The colours? The paragraph structure? All you’ve said is you don’t like it without even saying what you don’t like. If it’s not the words what is it?