Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along…

Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/

Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.

  • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No. It’s a date of birth. You’re right that age verification comes next, but this is not it. Had this field been present before, none of this would matter.

    Contact your representative, not your local FOSS maintainer.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Contact your representative, not your local FOSS maintainer.

      They’re not a US citizen.

      They also didn’t say they would contact the maintainers. They said they’d just change distro to a non-systemd one.

      And you’re nothing but silly trying to act like this isn’t about age “verification”. We know it is, because it comes in response to the new california law

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Contact your representative

      Right, so that they can ask if I’m stoned or stupid for asking them to affect laws in another country?

      • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Then this doesn’t impact you in any form. (Especially since it’s just a DoB).
        You can continue to whine but frankly I don’t see the point then.

        • lucas@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Of course it does. This particular change may seem innocuous in itself, but the idea of compliance with ridiculous laws like this one, in one jurisdiction, being implemented in a project used globally will result in compromising everyone’s privacy/security, regardless of whether they are even subject to that law or not.

          If anything, it’s more troubling for those outside the relevant jurisdiction, since we get 0 say on the laws, and have no actual reason to comply.