Whenever AI is mentioned lots of people in the Linux space immediately react negatively. Creators like TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube always feel the need to add a disclaimer that “some people think AI is problematic” or something along those lines if an AI topic is discussed. I get that AI has many problems but at the same time the potential it has is immense, especially as an assistant on personal computers (just look at what “Apple Intelligence” seems to be capable of.) Gnome and other desktops need to start working on integrating FOSS AI models so that we don’t become obsolete. Using an AI-less desktop may be akin to hand copying books after the printing press revolution. If you think of specific problems it is better to point them out and try think of solutions, not reject the technology as a whole.

TLDR: A lot of ludite sentiments around AI in Linux community.

  • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    So when we actually do have AI, what are we supposed to call it? The current use of the term “AI” is too ambiguous to be of any use.

    • jacobc436@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nothing was ever wrong with calling them “virtual assistants” - at least with them you’re conditioned to have a low bar of expectations. So if it performs past expectations, you’ll be excited, lol.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly what we have now is AI. As in it is not intelligent just trys to mimic it.

      Digital Intelegence if we ever achive it would be a more accurate name.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Look, the naming ship has sailed and sunk somewhere in the middle of the ocean. I think it’s time to accept that “AI” just means “generative model” and what we would have called “AI” is now more narrowly “AGI”.

        People call videogame enemies “AI”, too, and it’s not the end of the world, it’s just imprecise.

      • FatCat@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        This is a bit philosophical but who is to say that mimicking intelligence with advanced math is not intelligence. LLMs can perform various thinking tasks better than humans we consider intelligent.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      What AI means will change, what it refers to will change. Currently, the LLMs and other technologies are referred to as AI, like you say. In five years time we will have made huge leaps. Likely, this will result in technology also called AI.

      In a similar vein, hover boards are still known as exactly that - like in films. Whereas the “real” hover board that exists has wheels. We didn’t stop calling the other ones hover boards, and if we ever get real ones they will likely also be called hoverboards.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Whereas the “real” hover board that exists has wheels.

        Hovercraft have existed for decades and actually hover which makes everyone just accepting Hoverboards as wheeled infuriating.