This is really a much more interesting article:
https://www.theverge.com/policy/776840/charlie-kirk-death-social-media-jawboning
I was going to quote segments but it’s really worth reading the whole thing. Senators shitting all over the first amendment and quotes from Charlie Kirk shitting all over them in return.
People really don’t like either of those guys.
Musk should go into hiding.
There’s no coming back from where he is.
What has this have to do with technology? Wishing someone else is the next one.
Ted Cruz: Getting a little hot in here, isn’t it AOC?
AOC: Only for MAGAs, Ted.
Perhaps if he stoepped into Charlie’s shoes…
Elon Musk hates free speech.
How does … he… have any authority over Microsoft employees… you know what I’ll just read the article
Elon Musk controls a rabid lynch-mob. That is how he has any authority.
Elon Musk should be next IMO.
That means he’s very afraid
Musk, name people around the world would perforate you if they had the chance. Better hide in your bunker
So, he wants to make it so just criticizing Charlie Kirk is off limits, now?
Lol! Wut? I thought this guy told everyone he was a “free speech absolutist”. What a clown.
Without exception, “free speech absolutists” just want to say a specific brand of horrid shit themselves without social blowback. It never applies to free speech as a legal concept, and certainly never applies to speech they disagree with.
Without exception? No, I don’t think that’s true, it’s just the loudest ones, unfortunately.
For genuine free speech supporters like me, this is a problem because it makes the phrase “free speech” look bad and thereby contributes to a decline in it.
That’s why I specifically called out the phrase “free speech absolutist”.
In my experience the vast majority of people who truly do advocate for freedom of speech are willing/able to understand nuances such as the fact that your freedom of speech does not grant you immunity from the social consequences of unpopular speech. I.e., other people exercising their freedom to disagree or opt not to use their private platform to host your speech. The “absolutists” will unironically call that censorship, rather than recognize other people are not compelled to engage with their speech.
I prefer to think in these terms: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/moderation-is-different-from-censorship
His stance on free speech has been well established for a long time now. He champions free speech so long as it’s his speech. Any speech that disagrees with him is, in fact, itself an affront to free speech.
“I believe the rights enshrined in the 1st amendment applies to everybody I agree with.”
First Amendment guards against state repercussions for speech, with exceptions. Careful not to conflate the legal and colloquial usages.
“I’m going to use Congressional authority and every influence with big tech platforms to mandate immediate ban for life of every post or commenter that belittled the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I’m also going after their business licenses and permitting, their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively, they should be kicked from every school, and their drivers licenses should be revoked. I’m basically going to cancel with extreme prejudice these evil, sick animals who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination.”
- Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA)
Which is why everyone needs to get off of twitter. Especially government accounts.
Shut the fuck up, Elon. We’ll be celebrating your death, as well.
I’ll celebrate his even more
Maybe that why he wants to stop this, in the hopes someone will do the same for him.
Ding ding ding!
wE hAtE cAnCeL cUlTuRe aNd lOvE fReE sPeEcH
*Free speech **absolutist
*only available via subscription
**absolutely horseshit
OY
This fuckin’ timeline
