• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The reality is that Halo has never really been anything more than a mediocre fps when compared to what had already been coming out for years on PC.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The first few were really good on console. I played the first one on PC as well and there was definitely something missing with mouse and keyboard controls. The vehicles especially.

      You have to remember that most FPS on consoles were pretty terrible back then (e.g. Medal of Honor series), and there was a lot of experimentation to try and find a control scheme that didn’t completely suck, along with just the right amount of aim assist. Other devs were still wrestling with that into the Xbox 360 era. Sony put so much effort and money into Killzone, and it wasn’t anywhere near as good as Halo.

      Plus, split screen co-op made it very popular. It’s one of the few games to keep that into the modern era as well.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You have to remember that most FPS on consoles were pretty terrible back then

        As someone who was busy playing Battlefield 2, I beg to differ.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Oh, then Battlefield 1942 then. People here were saying 2005 so I went with the one I knew from 2005. Also, first isn’t always best, the BF games made Halo look like a school project imo

            I did miss the “on consoles” part of your quote though as I was referring to playing on PC so my bad.