• Jade@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yep, that’s the point described in the linked paper - traffic goes via the same domains used for their app, and the messenger is embedded in their app

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not only that, but every app will constantly appear to be sending messages, so real messages are greatly obfuscated. That’s honestly the real innovative part of the product IMHO.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          No it’s a bit complex. The transmissions are sent constantly at regular intervals and are a very specific size and are then combined later. So it’s not “instant” messaging. It’s closer to email.

          • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            So encrypted, periodical interval to mask out any incoming/out going variance in traffic I wonder how they mitigate the backend part as there might be a ton of wasted traffic to hide the actual traffic. since they obviously need a lot of users to hide the whistle blower, but that also mean their backend needs to be pretty smart to handle lots of traffic and still consume energy to decrypt and then throw away the “noise” data.