I think the problem with btrfs is that it entered the spotlight way to early. With Wayland there was time to work on a lot of the kinks before everyone started seriously switching.

On btrfs a bunch of people switched blindly and then lost data. This caused many to have a bad impression of btrfs. These days it is significantly better but because there was so much fear there is less attention paid to it and it is less widely used.

  • tekato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not if you were using Ubuntu in 2017 when they switched to Weston as the default display server for 17.10

    Do you have any source on Ubuntu using Weston as its default? As far as I know Ubuntu has always been GNOME, which doesn’t use Weston.

        • drspod@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          CTRL+F, “wayland”, 1 of 3 matches

          are you being deliberately obtuse or do you expect other people to do everything for you?

          • tekato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You said:

            Not if you were using Ubuntu in 2017 when they switched to Weston as the default display server for 17.10 and lots of people suffered a great deal from how half-baked the project was at the time.

            I said:

            Yes, the release notes you linked do not mention Weston at all.

            Unless you think Wayland is the same as Weston, I don’t see how you think I’m being “deliberately obtuse”.