People often use the OSI’s Open Source Definition when using the term “open source”. One of its criteria says “The license must allow modifications and derived works” which this license does not allow.
If your goal is to ever talk to people about open source software, that’s going to create a lot of unnecessary confusion.
I guess that my definition of open source is not that uncommon, given that the terms “free software” and “libre software” exist and are rather well-established by this point.
People often use the OSI’s Open Source Definition when using the term “open source”. One of its criteria says “The license must allow modifications and derived works” which this license does not allow.
Which is one of the possible definitions. Mine is “you can see the code”. Everything else falls into “free software”.
deleted by creator
I guess that my definition of open source is not that uncommon, given that the terms “free software” and “libre software” exist and are rather well-established by this point.
deleted by creator
@tux0r You are right that this mistaken definition is quite common. Smart person would try to correct the mistake, not defend it.
The term that is often used for that is “source available”. Good example of other software in this category would be what, Unreal Engine?