Currently I’m using Joplin with Syncthing-backed file system synchronization. I’m pretty pleased with it, as I do like tagging- and Markdown-based systems.

I plan to upgrade to server-based synchronization, but before doing that, however, I wanted to see what other people are using.

Edit: So far I see a slight favor towards Joplin and Logseq, but I totally didn’t expect (and appreciate) getting so many different answers.

  • ericjmorey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A nice grid lined notebook and a mechanical pencil is still my favorite.

    I like to use Google Keep for certain things, but I have a hard time explaining how those things are better for Google Keep.

    I’m looking at giving Neorg a try.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A nice grid lined notebook and a mechanical pencil is still my favorite.

      If only my default font wasn’t so bad that it causes data loss.

  • Quik@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Logseq, it’s a lot like Obsidian as it also has knowledge graphs, tags, is markdown-based and self-hostable but, in contrast to Obsidian, it’s fully open source

    • U de Recife@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Logseq user here too.

      However, for a quick, transitory note, I use Kate or, more recently, Xpad. Only then I transcribe the content to Logseq. Why?

      Because while Logseq is great as an outliner and for network thinking, it’s as graceful and agile as an elephant.

      The gist of what I’m saying is: for now, and for me (hardware might be playing a role here, but I don’t think so) Logseq is a good note database. For quick typing, I have to use something else.

  • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Joplin. Obsidian is not open source, doesn’t have native self hosting and it gets complicated. Joplin is very simple and just works. Although, it stores the notes in a hashed database, so you can’t edit raw files without Joplin client

    • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Problem with Joplin: The raw files are randomly named so you can’t easily find a specific note

      • krash@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s not even the bigger problem. I found the desktop ui very clunky. There were too many papercuts for me to keep using joplin. However, its TUI and mobile app are excellent.