I think it’s helpful to separate the problems of the technology itself from all the BS that big tech companies engage in when developing and pushing it.

Say you only use small, open-weight models that are hosted locally in a data center that is conscientious, environmentally clean, has strict data privacy policies and doesn’t pull the bullshit big-tech do.

You use them minimally and responsibly, you don’t over-rely on them. Is there a problem in that case?

Resisting this at all makes it look so much worse.

Maybe he had a bad day ¯_(ツ)_/¯

https://github.com/neovim/neovim.github.io/pull/504/files “Full-screen Neovim looks cool as hell!”

I think he just doesn’t like being bossed around with demands on issues he doesn’t feel are “important”. So he refused to do it out of principle. Of course then people like vultures started attacking him so he doubled down, can’t blame him.

But it seems like he changed his mind and removed it after all. The change got merged.

Calling it “nazi” just because the maintainer doesn’t remove an endorsement that let’s be real most people probably miss anyways… cmon zoom out a bit. Not saying it’s a good look but it’s really watering the word down.

What’s the difference between single vs double quotes?

I use bash and it did throw that error, however the find . | egrep *.py example at the end did not.

I’m interested why flathub > AUR? I try to minimize AUR usage but always assumed it’s better than flathub?