

I haven’t seen that, but the memory footprint is insane


I haven’t seen that, but the memory footprint is insane


What the shit??? Fucking team Cherry, they always hit you out of nowhere…


I don’t think you understand what doing code reviews is like.
So someone submits terrible code. You don’t get to just say “this is bad code” and reject it wholesale, you have to explain in exhaustive detail what the problems are. Doing otherwise leads to really toxic environments. It’s killed countless projects
That’s why you write rules. You don’t have to argue if they need tests or not, you tap the sign and reject it without actually reviewing it if it doesn’t meet the requirement
Same thing here. You open up vibe coded nonsense so you tap the sign and reject it without bothering to review it. Do the same thing with “bad code” as a reason and it starts insane drama.
People are really sensitive about their code, and there’s a whole methodology around how to do without ending up in a screaming match


Well I was just arguing that people generally are using AI irresponsibly, but if you want to get specific…
You say ban the users, but realistically how are they determining that? The only way to reliably check if something is AI is human intuition. There’s no tool to do that, it’s a real problem
So effectively, they made it an offense to submit AI slop. Because if you just use AI properly as a resource, no one would be able to tell
So what are you upset about?
They did basically what you suggested, they just did it by making a rule so that they can have a reason to reject slop without spending too much time justifying the rejection


People have already died to AI. It’s cute when the AI tells you to put glue on your pizza or asks you to leave your wife, it’s not so cute when architects and doctors use it
Bad information can be deadly. And if you rely too hard on AI, your cognitive abilities drop. It’s a simple mental shortcut that works on almost everything
It’s only been like 18 months, and already it’s become very apparent a lot of people can’t be trusted with it. Blame and punish those people all you want, it’ll just keep happening. Humans love their mental shortcuts
Realistically, I think we should just make it illegal to have customer facing LLMs as a service. You want an AI? Set it up yourself. It’s not hard, but realizing it’s just a file on your computer would do a lot to demystify it


We do this all the time. I’m certified for a whole bunch of heavy machinery, if I were worse people would’ve died
And even then, I’ve nearly killed someone. I haven’t, but on a couple occasions I’ve come way too close
It’s good that I went through training. Sometimes, it’s better to restrict who is able to use powerful tools


Okay, that’s pretty fair. You seem to understand the tool properly
I’d argue that version control is not the correct layer to evaluate output, but it is a tool that can be used in many different ways…I don’t think that’s a great workflow, but I can conceive situations where that’s viable enough
If I were handing out authorizations to use AI, you’d get it


That sounds like copium… But I’ll hear you out. What if VC? It better not be version control


The difference is people aren’t being responsible with AI
You’re projecting competence onto others. You speak like you’re using AI responsibly
I use AI when it makes things easier. All the time. I bet you do too. Many people are using AI without a steady hand, without the intellectual strength to use it properly in a controlled manner


I mean… That actually sounds pretty reasonable. If you want to soft launch to your fans to get things ready for a larger launch, go for it


It doesn’t anymore… It crashed like 5x today, and that’s not including the times where it froze for 5+ minutes and recovered


Have you heard of Slate? They sound a lot like what you’re looking for


But like… You could just make it physical. Put a couple extra leads on the PCB, charge the capacitor, and let the button close the circuit mechanically. You might have to do a couple tests, but that’s better than having storage with a delete button on it
What does a delete button add? It’ll take minutes. Might as well put an e-stop button on your desk that connects to your computer by USB
It’s basically security theatre


I mean, you could probably pick two strategic pins and fry the wells… You might have to do a few of them to make sure that your hit every bank. If you blow through the insulation between them, I can’t imagine any method could recover the data. And it shouldn’t take much current
The liquid thing was just because… You know, solid state drive


Why are you wiping the data? Why not just slag the whole chip… Hard to read an SSD in liquid form


I mean, it could just be a capacitor. It’s easier to fry something than make it delete itself


Because AI is the first form of automation that doesn’t run on humans. Theoretically.
Now, can AI replace humans? No, obviously not at this stage. It can help humans do more, but only an idiot would trust it to do something important without a human in the loop
Is it? Yes. They are firing people and letting AI attempt to make the difference. They’re cutting entire departments in some cases


Because they don’t work as phones, at least not for practical use
No one has cracked it yet, some projects seem to be getting close, but the radio in a phone is a very complicated and poorly documented black box


And if you agree to their new terms of service (there’s only an accept button when you open the site), you agree it’s not discord’s fault!
Such innovation.
I’ve heard “join the discord” pretty often too