Proprietary projects and clean room implementation is often done without having the source code first though, and a clean room implementation assumes its actually clean. meanwhile, most of llms nowadays cant be verifiably do clean room because the source code is probably there too.

When Linus does clean room to make Linux, does he have access to the source code, or does he need to figure out things by himself and only match the interface later on?

I’m sure both of us aren’t good enough to solve this billion dollar problem, but saying its not a problem to steal someone’s work, disregarding their license (even MIT requires attributions!), and releasing their mangled copy as a new product, is dystopian.

The problem isnt the fact snippets exist in a codebase. The problem is, the entire fucking website is scraped clean of every codebase that has ever existed without paying a dime to their owner, notifying of their usage, and being transparent of their datasets.

How can it be verifiably responsible if their activity is handwaved under the guise of “business secret”? Its literally people using other peoples work without fair compensation, which means stealing, which means someone has to pay.

how about making an effort in the first place? to at least make an effort to list all repository thats being used as training data.

Responsible use of llms can’t be achieved. Can you verify that all of your training data are square with its creators? If not, how is that responsible?

BUT AI IS THE FUTURE PLEASE BRO JUST ONE MORE GPU JUST ONE MORE BOOK JUST ONE MORE RESEARCH ITS GOING TO BE GOOD IT WILL REPLACE EVERYONE PLEASE BRO

Can they ramp up their distribution for south east asia? There’s just too many slop hardware in Indonesia, too many AI, too little rightly built laptops. Can’t believe I said this, but the only sane buy for new laptops are old gens thinkpads and apple devices.

I don’t even like using macs, but it’s true, their build quality is better than your run of the mill asus/acer (the predominant brand here) laptops.

such a shame that android is owned by such a bad company…

>findroid

looks inside

>not a fish

scam

Paul Allen got great cards.

from the letter

What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free?

Im all for giving fair or even plentiful compensation to developers who made our softwares. But, how times and hindsight made this passage sounds like, “wait you guys got paid?”

thank you for this explanation, it gave me the right perspective. I will check that channel out!

Now about that fab line, is that still protected under a secrecy license? What’s stopping the Chinese from making their own fab line besides the ASML monopoly?

yeah, comment above really gave me a picture that 16nm is really small

yes, but fabricating a CPU on a small enough form factor is still an issue, afaik

thank you, now we just need to funds these people so they can work at it with more than a duct tape and a litre of coffee.

holy shit

I’m not trying to create the new Core i7 here, just something that can run as well as a raspberry pi. My imagination that a nation/company need to start small and aim small, before exploring other more complex architecture.

Now that’s an ISA, I understand that. But what about the hardware itself, isnt that the hard part? I’m using the viewpoint of the manufacturer, feasibility.

I always watch at least 10+ gameplay videos and critiques before buying games, especially AAA. For indies, I don’t do it as much, more like “surprise me” kind of experience.

Shameless plug, but if you want something offline, with rich text, tagging, trees, quick search, small, and encrypted…

You can use treedome! https://codeberg.org/solver-orgz/treedome/releases/tag/0.5.4