btw the joke is that Wine literally stands for “Wine Is Not an Emulator”

https://www.winehq.org/

Are you telling me wine is not emulation?

Homework kid confirmed.

I feel like that last paragraph has been written about every generation in human history.

“used AI to detect a bug that they were using to crack consoles, and reported it to Sony for a bounty.” Wow, what a fucking loser. This was probably the kid who reminded the teacher that they forgot to assign homework.

*Cortisol levels return to normal.*

It’s about time, but 4K @ 60 FPS USB Video Capture still hasn’t apologized for their problematic statements.

How does this compare to Helmarr?

“But Minecraft already works on Wayl… oh…”

I think you’re overthinking it. You don’t need to render every skin. You just need a box that’s the maximum bounds for that player model. Again, we’re talking really low poly wireframes.

These bounds are standardized across every client, so the server already knows this information.

Games already do this with hurt boxes.

But the server is the authority on player location. It can tell if a player is visible to another because it knows their locations (as well as any obfuscations) at any given instant. It doesn’t need to know what they’re going to do next until it gets that next input from the client.

Obviously calculating this requires more work on the server’s part, but in smaller competitive matches this is totally doable. We’re talking basic wireframe vectors.

EDIT: Yall are really starting to convince me to make a proof of concept for this, because I’m convinced it can be done.

It helps that StarCraft, while somewhat relying on speed, is much more about strategy, meta knowledge, and real-time adaptation when your plan isn’t working.

That’s not something you can easily script, even with LLMs. That’s why the bot players have to use cheats at higher difficulties, because decent players outsmart them pretty quickly.

This is definitely solvable, though. The server can only send the client location updates of players they should be able to see.

If someone tried to wall hack, they’d only see the last known location before line of sight was broken.

Giving the client that data at all is like playing Battleship side-by-side and telling the player not to look at the other board.

Now modern servers could dedicate each player their own CPU thread (except for maybe big battle royale servers).

Really? Tell me why.

I thought n’tsync was delayed because when I asked about the release, the devs said it’s gonna be May.

There is definitely some truth to this, but I suspect these numbers are inflated quite a bit by all the BS LLM-generated bug reports.

Sounds like you’ve been listening to Linux Unplugged, ha. Drive support is generally good in my experience. If you’re going to buy one for writing, then I’d also recommend one that can be flashed with Libredrive. That way you can also rip encrypted BluRays and store them without DRM.

I haven’t used burning software in a long time, but you may have issues getting them in a format that will just play back normally on players, especially if you put a bunch of movies on one disc. I think they need some sort of menu system, but maybe some burning software can build a rudimentary one? idk

Optical archival storage is tempting right now because of the price, though it definitely is more of an archival solution. Good for long term cold backups, but not great for any data that needs to change, even infrequently.

Yeah I’m thinking the request frequency was the issue rather than bandwidth.

Thanks! I haven’t tried that dashboard yet, I might give it a spin.