- MDK and MDK2
- King’s Quest VI
- Leisure Suite Larry 6
- Mario Paint
They were getting paid to develop the Linux kernel? No? Then what’s actually the requirement?
Be the change you wish to see in this world.
https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo-integration/runner/src/tag/v2.0.0
Federated in this case means Fediverse integration.
Computers work with 1s and 0s. We have decided as a society that certain combinations of those equate to being copywritable. This ruling seems to be saying the result of a calculation cannot be copywritable? Wouldn’t creative tools like movie editor or photoeditor disagree? So then is the ruling actually saying these specific values used in this instance are not copywritable, changing the health to 100 for e.g., because there is no human creativity in the result of that value?
So if a programmer used an original work of art to define the state of health in the actual code, and verified the value matches the 1s and 0s that represent that work of art (thus it only ever comes down to boolean check in the logic side, and the value of the variable is never set to something simple like 0 to 100, it was using a huge amount of RAM and a very slow comparator operator.
Yea, I went there.
I’m not explaining it properly. Imagine instead of 100 hp, there is apple bananas. That isn’t really a mathematic representation in the same way that the cheat code can change. It would be a copyrighted work of art. It wouldn’t be trivial to build an hp system to do this (in fact it would be a large undertaking), but I am not asking about practicality, just what the law would find.
I mean what if you didn’t use 20/100 for the value, you used a symbol (in the code as the value). Would it still apply?
What if the health values are human creations like special symbols or works of creative art?
Nitter link not working. What’s the jist?
What is the tmpfs for?
Charts like that are great, I love to see them. However, they need to have a year for the inflation-adjusted dollars else it’s nearly meaningless when referred back to.
What’s new in this release:
I’m a bit slow on the uptake there haha. I started with vi and moved over to nano at some point and never looked back. I can refactor code in production with the best of them. There’s still some tricks I’ve seen done in vi that amazes me that I haven’t tried to figure out in nano, but for the most part it’s fairly easy to use to do nearly anything in. Even supports color for supported files, YAML, etc.
Honestly, roll back to previous release for production and use best IDE your developers are used to on their local machines, test the fix in a non production environment then release to prod. When is editing business critical scripts in production really needed?
Same. Stage 1 install will forever be a core memory for me.
Is this like a remastered original or did they name a new game 1?
deleted by creator
Probably the “but”. I agree that both are exploitive and they should all be called out on it.
But what about…? Doesn’t excuse the first thing!
Wow looks like it was released last year. Thanks, I had no idea!