there is no proprietary AMD Linux driver
I mean, there is. It just isn’t recommended for most users.
there is no proprietary AMD Linux driver
I mean, there is. It just isn’t recommended for most users.
FYI: If you aren’t aware, Arch has a CLI installer now that is very easy to use, should you ever want to give it a try (archinstall)
Endeavour is basically Arch with a more user friendly installer, a very small number of their own packages, and a coat of paint.
Manjaro is similar, except Manjaro runs their own repositories and delays packages for testing. This can lead to a whole bunch of issues when combined with the AUR. The team leading it has also been shown to be a little inept at times. I wouldn’t personally recommend it.
…What are you talking about?
How did you install PCSX2? The fact that you are launching it through Cartridge makes me a little worried that you are using the windows version. Try the AppImage or Flatpak packages and see if you have any improvement (assuming you aren’t already using those)
…What? This is Redis. Linux doesn’t really benefit from this (aside from being an OS that can host Redis)
Ah yeah, fair enough.
@piotrkulpinski@lemmy.world you might want to look into disabling error reporting in production 👍
There’s a submission link on the top of the page
Search seems broken. The following gives me a “Something went wrong” page
While I don’t disagree with your sentiment, it seems like this list is just “self hosted open source alternatives”. Even if there are better options, Gitea still falls under that definition, no?
Also i have a second panel at the top of my second monitor so i can always see the current date and time.
I think this one is probably very popular. I had a very hard time giving Gnome a chance because of its inability to do this by default.
deleted by creator
People in this thread have very interesting ideas of what “shit hardware” is
True that
Thanks for the explanation. I was hoping it was this instead of “I disagree!”
Both of your posts to this community are videos that were posted a few hours earlier. Should have a peek before you post.
How does one qualify how much a language needs to be used?
Are you saying Rust is being used in places that you feel C/C++ should be used, and you don’t think Rust belongs? Or maybe you are saying Rust is being used in places where C/C++ are not typically used, and you don’t feel it belongs there?
The closest thing to context you’ve given is that you feel Rust has flaws (all languages do), and that Ada is perhaps safer. It’s really hard to give any kind of answer without a properly fleshed out question.
Overused
What is the correct amount of usage? Why shouldn’t people use the languages they want to?
+1 on lower tier Intel CPU mini PC. I have a slew of different boxes by Beelink, Intel, and Asus. The N95 box I bought from Beelink (basically an N100) has been one of the most impressive for being so low power, and yet handling the wealth of services I’ve been running on it (with a lot of overhead yet).
Installing is just following directions. It’s maintaining it after you Frankenstein the hell out of it that most new users struggle with