The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

In what way?

Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

But yeah, bad ux.