Not every court order is a criminal case.
Not every court order is a criminal case.
NY Times vs Njalla
Njalla does comply with some requests, and was forced to shut down some pirate bay instances at one point, though. Ghost is another privacy domain seller.
Theres also a term for companies called “Bulletproof Registrars.” For example, some Malaysian Registrars apparently don’t have an address and cannot actually recieve most subpoenas.
Mostly VPNs, I don’t know too much about similar cases with server hosts or domain sellers.
It comes down to the individual company on whether or not to fight requests for user information. A lot of precedent exists for not complying.
I’m saying if you payed for a service to host your instance remotely. The domain, the site pages, the the database, everything. Then, everything on the domain would be tied to your person and the service providers have a certain power over your instance aside from just turning off your domain. There are more options to not list or to delist from the WhoIs registry for simple domain purchases.
I just have trust issues, you don’t need to mind my crazy ramblings.
You should be good as long as you know PostgreSQL
Same way things get leaked by Equifax, Twitch, US Bank, etc. You’re most responsible with your information by not having unnecessary accounts or transactions.
Also, most hosts have WhoIs and ICANN registrations for Domains, but you still need a domain regardless. And further than that they might allow subpeonas from various companies who request the info.
How much server hosting experience do you have? I asked about database preferences over in Self-Hosting once and they basically all said “don’t choose a database ever. Run. Save yourself while there is still time!”
So maybe use a hosting service I guess. Makes you a more difficult target for attacks but also involves your information getting out into the world in direct connection to your instance.
Scum company, we will remember
Well thats somewhat unnerving.
I was going to ask why the thumbnail on this post is a hexagon shaped bear, but your comment explains it well enough.
https://help.copyright.gov/contact/s/contact-form
You should also contact your local representatives across the federal government.
Its probably against the Emulator’s License unless they built their own from scratch, and a Windows PC is actually pretty overkill.
If I obtain all the original schematics and software and make 1 Nintendo internals for commercial purposes wothout their permission it would be illegal.
If they do it, it costs them the price of a couple of family dinners at most.
This museum IS NINTENDO. They are the only people allowed to do this job correctly.
This is a “Museum” run by Nintendo in Japan. Meaning they could have used or even created more original hardware to run the titles, but instead cut costs by using the same Emulators that they’re hoping to take down.
Since a lot of you seem to dislike this post, I would love to hear why.
Also nudes, remember to mark nsfw
deleted by creator
No thats not true. You need to have steam installed and be logged into an account to play a steam game, always.
DRM is added by the developers/publishers not by GOG, tho.
TBF an online Windows 7 copy is just asking to be Hacked given Microsoft support ended in 2020 and security updates after that required a paid subscription which ended in 2023.