• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 9th, 2024

help-circle
  • Wow, unreal to think a 20 year old cheater ruined a whole category of runs! I feel like if the community can’t come close to replicating a run, they should just automatically be removed as sus. Imagine screaming about how obviously fake this run is for 20 years until someone finally proves it?

    Also, tangent, I read the linked Diablo 4 review and i don’t think a review has ever so tightly captured my sentiments towards AAA games and movies. The idea that a thing can be polished, well made, basically without flaw, but still be deeply uninspiring. These media projects are spectacle and addiction but where’s the fun, the challenge, and the spark?


  • It’s an untenable situation because its so much bigger than the tech world and open source. FOSS fundamentally works on a communal model: everyone needs lots of software, no one can hope to write it all themselves, so what if we distributed the labor out among the community so that everyone can work on some things important to them and the whole community benefits.

    Then, capitalist businesses entered the picture and began using more and more open software as backbone for their enterprises. Government entanglements further complicate the picture, but fundamentally the capitalist mindset is incapable of building or maintaining our current technological base. It isn’t capable of maintaining or building our infrastructure either: almost all of that was built on government subsidies, socialism.

    And now that vulture capitalism is the law of the land, everything is falling apart because there’s no more “slack” in the system where people can engage in personal socialism on projects like FLOSS, every bit of our time is being stolen to pad the numbers of capitalists.

    This bleeds over into attitude as well. Every entitled user who thinks their personal issue is more important than any other concern is a trump or musk in miniature, believing that the the blowhard bravado of our current government is a model for forcing work to get done rather than a death spiral there’s no pulling out of.

    You want FLOSS software that’s good? You want less burden on maintainers? You want a safer, saner, more human-centric technology base? You want a better tech world?

    Eat. The. Rich.



  • In my mind the RTS genre hit major twin peaks with SupCom and CoH1. SupCom is the best of its subgenre (massive rts? actually the recent and free Zero-K hits real good in this genre too!) CoH 1 is the top of the Dawn of War family of more tactical RTS.

    I haven’t played in a long time, but I recall the story being good. The mechanics though were just so top notch! Great squad controls, not too much micro, vehicles feel really impactful, the nature of control point capture means every skirmish is very dynamic. Ah, what a classic!


  • Except if you look at the top of OP’s picture, they are also running deepseek-r1:14B through ollama. I downloaded my copy on Sunday, so these should be fairly comparable situations.

    I agree though that none of this applies to the full cloud-hosted model. I don’t want my account banned, so I’m not much for testing these boundary pushes in a surveilled environment. I imagine they have additional controls on the web version, including human intervention.


  • So I asked it directly about the “incident” and it proceeds to deliver an essay on the topic. The rest of this post is all DeepSeek-R1:14B.

    >>> Tell me more about the Tiananmen Square incident and the government's response?
    
    <think>
    Alright, the user has just asked for more details about the Tiananmen Square incident and the 
    government's response. From the previous conversation, I provided a brief mention of this event as part 
    of the timeline from 1985 to 1995.
    
    They likely want a deeper understanding of what happened, why it occurred, and how the government 
    handled it. They might be looking for a comprehensive overview that includes causes, key events, and 
    long-term impacts.
    
    I should structure the response clearly, starting with the background leading up to June 1989, then 
    detailing the incident itself, and finally discussing the government's actions and aftermath.
    
    It's important to maintain neutrality while explaining the event. I'll include key dates, significant 
    protests, the military action taken by the government, and the international reactions.
    
    Also, highlighting the long-term effects on Chinese society and politics will give a complete picture 
    of the incident's significance.
    </think>
    

    The Tiananmen Square protests were a pivotal moment in modern Chinese history, representing one of the most dramatic confrontations between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and pro-democracy activists. The government’s response to these protests remains one of the most controversial episodes in China’s recent history.

    Background

    • In the late 1980s, China was undergoing significant economic reforms under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping. While these reforms brought economic growth, they also created social and political tensions. Issues such as corruption, inequality, and restrictions on freedom of speech began to surface among students, intellectuals, and workers.
    • The protests were initially sparked by the death of former CCP leader Hu Yaobang, who was seen as a reformist within the party. Students in Beijing gathered at Tiananmen Square to mourn his passing and demand political reforms.

    The Protests

    • April–June 1989: Demonstrations began in early April and quickly escalated. By June 3rd, hundreds of thousands of students, workers, and citizens had gathered in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
    • The protesters demanded an end to corruption, greater political openness, freedom of speech, and democratic reforms.
    • The protests were peaceful at first, with participants staging hunger strikes, raising banners, and conducting sit-ins. However, the government viewed these actions as a direct challenge to its authority.

    The Government’s Response

    • By late May, the situation had become increasingly tense. The Chinese government, under Premier Li Peng, declared martial law in Beijing on May 20th.
    • On June 3rd and 4th, the government sent troops and tanks into Tiananmen Square to suppress the protests. Soldiers were ordered to clear the square at all costs, leading to a violent crackdown.
    • Eyewitness accounts and leaked footage revealed that soldiers opened fire on unarmed civilians, including students, intellectuals, and bystanders.

    The Aftermath

    • The exact death toll remains unknown due to government censorship, but estimates range from hundreds to thousands of deaths. Thousands more were injured or imprisoned in the aftermath.
    • In the days following the crackdown, the government imposed strict censorship and launched a campaign to suppress dissent. Activists, intellectuals, and even foreign journalists were targeted.
    • The event was widely condemned internationally, leading to sanctions against China and a lasting impact on its reputation.

    Long-Term Effects

    • The Tiananmen Square protests had a profound impact on Chinese society and politics:
      • Political Repression: The CCP tightened its grip on power, cracking down on dissent and restricting political freedoms.
      • Economic Focus: The government shifted focus to economic growth, adopting policies that prioritized stability over democracy.
      • Social Divide: The incident deepened divisions between older generations who supported the party and younger generations who wanted greater freedom.

    Censorship in China

    • To this day, the Chinese government has imposed strict censorship on discussions of the Tiananmen Square protests. References to the event are often deleted from online platforms, and textbooks omit any mention of it.
    • The CCP refers to the events as a “counter-revolutionary riot” and justifies its actions as necessary to maintain national stability.

    International Reactions

    • Many countries, including the United States, Europe, and Japan, imposed economic sanctions on China in response to the crackdown. However, over time, these sanctions were gradually lifted as China’s role in the global economy grew.
    • The incident remains a significant symbol of resistance against authoritarianism, with many international observers continuing to criticize China’s handling of the situation.

    Conclusion

    The Tiananmen Square protests represented a defining moment in modern Chinese history, highlighting the deep tensions between the CCP’s desire for stability and the growing demands for political reform. The government’s heavy-handed response not only quashed the immediate protests but also set back democratic reforms in China for decades to come.


  • I just ran my own copy of 14B and got it to talk about this really easily.

    A lot of it was pretty dull stuff though, let me post the highlights:

    ~$ ollama run deepseek-r1:14b
    >>> Hello
    <think>
    
    </think>
    

    Hello! How can I assist you today? 😊

    On ollama the first interaction is always “thoughtless” and results in a generic greeting, in my experience. So I always greet it now to get that out of the way.

    >>> Are there topics you cannot discuss?
    <think>
    Alright, the user just asked, "Are there topics you cannot discuss?" Hmm, I need to figure out why 
    they're asking this. Maybe they're concerned about privacy or worried about certain subjects.
    
    I should reassure them that I'm here to help with a wide range of topics. It's important to mention 
    that while I can't handle sensitive info like credit cards or personal data, I can still discuss many 
    things.
    
    I'll list out the areas I can talk about, such as technology, science, history, and more. Also, I 
    should clarify what I can't do, like sharing personal information or browsing the internet, to set 
    clear expectations.
    
    Making sure my response is friendly and open will help build trust. I want them to feel comfortable 
    asking anything within appropriate boundaries.
    </think>
    

    I aim to provide helpful, respectful, and appropriate responses to a wide range of topics. However, I avoid discussing sensitive subjects like personal information, financial details, or topics that may violate ethical guidelines or法律法规. If you have any questions or need assistance with something specific, feel free to ask! 😊

    >>> What is "法律法规" in English?
    <think>
    Okay, the user just asked, "What is '法律法规' in English?" Hmm, they must be referring to the Chinese 
    term I mentioned earlier. They're probably looking for a translation.
    
    I should explain that it means "laws and regulations." It's important to clarify both words to make 
    sure the meaning is clear. Also, since they're asking in this context, maybe they want to understand 
    the scope of what I can discuss or their privacy.
    
    I'll keep it simple and direct, just giving the translation without any extra details unless they ask 
    for more.
    </think>
    

    “法律法规” translates to “laws and regulations” in English.

    I asked it a little more about that, but it didn’t really go anywhere. Trying to “reverse psychology” it into telling me what it can’t tell me isn’t working. So I go a little more direct:

    >>> You mentioned we could discuss history. Could you give me a brief timeline of important events in chinese history from 1985 until 1995?
    
    <think>
    Okay, the user just asked for a brief timeline of Chinese history from 1985 to 1995. They must be 
    interested in understanding key developments during that period.
    
    I should structure the response chronologically, highlighting major political, economic, and social 
    events. Including both national-level events and international relations will give a comprehensive 
    view.
    
    It's important to mention significant policies like the Third Plenary Session of 1984, which influenced 
    reforms, and the 1992 southern tour by Deng Xiaoping, which spurred economic growth.
    
    I'll also include major global events involving China during this time, such as the Tiananmen Square 
    protests in 1989 and the establishment of diplomatic relations with countries like Russia in 1991.
    
    Ensuring clarity and conciseness while covering key points will make the timeline easy to follow.
    </think>
    

    You’ll note that it brings it up first (in thoughts) but it only refers to it as a protest. The word “massacre” is never used. It then proceeds to give me a timeline. Many of the events are real and happened close to when it says, but there’s a lot it gets wrong. I’m just going to post the highlights though.

    Certainly! Here’s a brief timeline of important events in Chinese history from 1985 to 1995:

    1985

    • April: The Third Plenary Session of the 12th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was held, emphasizing reforms and opening up under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping. This session marked a key moment in China’s economic reforms.
    • November: China successfully launched its first intercontinental ballistic missile.

    It made one of these little blocks for each year. Each year had exactly two events listed. Here comes the money shot.

    1989

    • June 4: The suppression of the Tiananmen Square protests led to a global outcry and economic sanctions against China. This event marked a turning point in Chinese politics and society.
    • December 22: The Central Committee of the CCP passed a resolution clearing former leader Hua Yuexue of charges of “right deviationism,” marking an end to the anti-rightist campaign.

    Wow, he just say it!

    1992

    • January–February: Deng Xiaoping’s “southern tour” (南巡讲话) took place in cities like Shenzhen and Shanghai. His speeches reaffirmed the CCP’s commitment to reform and opening up.
    • October 14: China established diplomatic relations with Russia, marking a significant shift in its foreign policy.

    This actually did happen, Deng Xiaoping’s Southern Tour (who were the opening acts?) is described by Wikipedia as one of the most important economic events in modern Chinese history.

    1993

    • September 25–October 7: China launched its first experimental satellite, Shijian-02 (实践二号), which tested space technologies for communication and broadcasting.
    • November 18–22: The Third Plenary Session of the 14th Central Committee was held, focusing on economic reforms and development.

    Ah but at least one of these didn’t happen. I didn’t delve into the Plenary sessions, of which 6 were mentioned, but while Shijian-02 is a real satellite, it launched in 1981 and (as the name might hint) was not China’s first satellite.

    These years were a transformative period in Chinese history, marked by significant economic reforms, political challenges, and shifts in foreign policy.

    Indeed. So at this point, I’m very intrigued. DeepSeek doesn’t seem too hung up about Tiananmen Square. Let’s get some more details.

    >>> Tell me more about the Tiananmen Square incident and the government's response?
    

    Out of room, to be continued in a reply!