ルルㇲ

Because the masses that use Steamdb to make financial decisions on when to purchase games, the folk looking to save money, are the first to not pay for the research service they depended on. Take a look rn at the upvotes. If 229 people paid a dollar to crowdfund its independence, steamdb wouldn’t have been a financial loss. Yet months of pleading went unanswered, until Black Tree Gaming Ltd. offered to monetize the site. 80~% of the users caused the site to operate at a cost, 20% offered to monetize it as an investment. Black Tree Gaming Ltd. won the bid. I don’t blame steamdb for choosing to sell it, I blame users for not financing it above costs.

In piefed, you can see my reaction.

Pure editorial narrative, Julian Benson.

it is surprising that noone came to help him.

not according to lemmy.

Threadiverse would be the first to cite you Pareto distribution’s without proposing ways to inverse it. Damn leeches!

blah, here’s the 📔.

Simple fix: show your work.
Kickstarters don’t have these accusations simply because the devs are in a direct relationship with the investors. There’s no NDA. Indies want to make a game, backers support it. Indie shows work.
Now show your work.

It’s literally Gloria Martinez and her stolen Neuroport

nice, got a 🎞️2👀 😋🍿

Did they just steal the plot of Cyberpunk2077‽

In Asia, we use “cocoon” instead.
If you see someone with a butterfly or cocoon tattoo, they are already telling you they came out.

Then why isn’t Valve a Bank⸮

Nazism*

I am unsure your point here. Every1🧵 knows these unionists are unemployed.
We are wondering why they would go this far for a game that is already leaked.

Yeah, but R⁎ can remove the entire parts they worked on the game entirely, making exposure a gamble.
Fair point about transitioning, not one I sympathize. (changed industries 15 times already )

1&3 seem plausible. 2) Not so much, since everyone of these unionists are merchandising their portfolios. If it’s about the art, they can redo mockups of the work they want others to see in the game that hasn’t been completed. For all we know, R⁎ will cut their works out.

3. Is iffy for two reason: plenty of non gamedev jobs out there that don’t do history checks, esp. on a work visa. They did make themselves public though.

4. feels like the closest reason, as they have already declared themselves disassociates from the leaker. Maybe they want the court to see they were wrongfully terminated, and “should be compensated.”

I am equally dumbfounded as well.
If only there was some way to address these unionists what demands need to be met, and what their goals truly are.

I know for sure they can’t syndicate. Not on work visas.

I’m at the conclusion that their work visas expired, and they need the game to succeed in order to stay in
I would have already found another job to keep my visa valid.

Sony/PSN ≢Denuvo.

don’t forget the most important dissonance: [email protected] doesn’t want to be associated with the leaker, and is still wants to engage in capitalist dynamics Take Two Int. has all the leverages on.

at this point SKG is counter consumer “rights”