data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a275a/a275a1d57848f3a50833063228381406c0f673d6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0fd/ee0fdf6136fd6c175f3de7094a75741df41c1923" alt=""
1·
9 days agoNow that I could get behind, although shredding files has taken on a different meaning now (i.e. overwriting files so they are irrecoverable).
Now that I could get behind, although shredding files has taken on a different meaning now (i.e. overwriting files so they are irrecoverable).
Not really, no. We might add a word or two to clarify the kind of waste but not a different word entirely.
Unfortunately mine says flashlight which is a mild annoyance since it doesn’t flash.
It’s “Wastebasket” in the UK on the GNOME desktop. I’m happy enough with that.
I second this. Not wanting to shoot down your idea, quite a big deciding factor for me is the release cycle and update process and you won’t experience that in a week. Might be a good idea to list what you’ve already tried though.
Just to add to the other replies you’ve got, as far as I’m aware there’s no reason why you can’t add Fedora’s flatpak repo on another distro. Why you would want to is another matter, but I think the fact that anyone can make their own repo is the fundamental strength of flatpak as opposed to snaps; it’s not tied to one organisation, Flathub is the de facto central repo but it doesn’t always have to be.