Sciences and space has used SI for ever….

These same discussion happened with photoshop and “brush tools” why are those acceptable to make it less labor intensive, but this isn’t?

It’s more hypocrisy over purism, as you’ve so nicely pointed out.

What have you debunked?

The same “repeating” can be said to you, and is probably why you’re projecting more fallacies onto me.

Ant “debunking” you’ve done, is to justify your bias that certain tools to replace humans are okay. And that’s obviously a hypocrital take, so what’s your real issue here? Just like anyone else, the term “ai” is just a trigger and you don’t like it? It to have it poured to your already “acceptable” tools make you go “REE”?

These same conversations were had with luddites like you when spellcheck came out, than PS, than grammarly. And guess what? They’re acceptable in everyday use.

The same will happen with AI as people treat more like a tool than a toy. Than jackasses like you will be left behind again, but then try and justify it like you are beee when the next one comes out.

Hypocritical Luddites like you are just the worst kind of fucking people.

Says the hypocrite that says one tool that replaces humans is okay, but not another.

Okay buddy, just because you can’t make a coherent argument or come up with a legitimate reason why one’s acceptable doesn’t make me slow. If anything just shows how flawed and fucked your reasoning is.

People have always used tools to replace humans. So this decry NOW over ai is what’s bullshit. They shouldn’t enable to use PS brush tools either. Same process, same outcome, the ai can actually be able to do more and remove labor. But now “that’s” not okay. This is what me and other users are pointing out.

But your “ai bad” bias, has made you ignorant to any actual discussions.

If you don’t want ai, than you don’t want grammarly, spellcheck, auto correct, PS or any other tool. If you do, you’re frankly a bloody Luddite hypocrite.

Different tools with different costs and different outcomes.

Both have replaced human labor, why are bringing up costs? No one’s mentioned that, gotta use fallacies to justify the hypocrisy? The outcomes the same. Use less human labor to make art.

But sure justify one while decrying the other, hypocrite.

You seem to be missing the point that’s been made here since your ignorance is “ai bad”.

A tools a tool, any tool can be abused. So it’s a very hypocrital view to say these tools are acceptable, but make up arbitrary reasons why those ones aren’t. That’s what’s being done here, and why people are trying to shift the conversation focus to the “tool itself”.

Since even photoshop, grammarly, or any other non-ai tool is labour a usable too.

If we want humans doing stuff, why is a brushing tool acceptable? It’s not a human doing the work. So yeah the views here are extremely hypocritical.

Ah, so this kind of tool is allowable, but not another? Pretty hypocritical thinking there.

A tools is a tool, any tool can be abused.

deleted by creator

Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?

People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…? You say people won’t use one… yet it’s already been a thing for years, your ignorance is i ionic as shit here.

It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.

Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?

A tool is a tool dude. Why are you trying to justify one over the other?

What do you think grammarly is dude? Glorified spell and auto check, which people already utilize everyday. But of course new tools are looked down upon, the hypocrisy of people is amazing to see. It comes in cycles, people hated spell check, got used to it and now it’s prominent in every life, autocorrect, same thing is happening.

And now the same is happening again. If they want to claim no ai, no spellcheck, no auto correct, and no grammarly for emails. Everyone already uses “AI” everyday. But theirs is acceptable… okay…

Then you better give up spellcheck and autocorrect.

Gacha

Gacha is the prime example to use for loot boxes.

I covered this in my original comment, thanks though I guess.

You are just ignoring that the installers can be downloaded and saved. Or even just the game directory can continue to work.

Dude, no I am not, my very first comment in this chain talked about the needing to download and store it in a non-degrading way…. Fucking he’ll dude lmfao.

How can the installers access a file that no longer exists since the servers are shut down and the files can no longer be accessed…?

My phrasing is confusing since the point literally is fucking pointless, it’s moot, doesn’t matter since it can’t be accessed licensed or not.

That’s literally the point, it’s a useless argument since it doesn’t fucking matter lmfao.

And how does that work when they close down and servers that host the games can no longer be accessed to download your license free game?

Wheter you have a revokabke license or not, you still won’t ever be able to access the game…… how do people need this explained to them? And yet use this single reason like it matters lmfao.

I didn’t know IKEA made video games?

And why does that matter? When they go out of business you can’t download even if you do or don’t have a license.

That’s why it matters.

Because you now have a game that you don’t need a license that you still won’t be able to access or play? So how does that make a single fucking difference lmfao.

That’s my point… it literally doesn’t matter that they can revoke you license or not, when the servers are down, you’re fucked regardless.

Hence why it’s a pointless argument to bring up…

What else do you think I meant here?