To be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.

Of course that could just be what they want us to think.

I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?

I suspect onlyoffice will win this one

I’m sceptical tbh, their interpretation of the AGPL seems questionable. The specific wording in the AGPL they’re relying on for their logo preservation term is:

Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it

IMO a logo isn’t attribution, and even if it was there’s no way it could be considered reasonable to require it if they don’t allow you to use it.

Again? They forgot to tell the Serbs the F117 was invisible

There’s some irony in that sponsor block has to block four segments of the video.

Grapheneos are also against allowing users root access, which is fine on PCs.

The sensor size also plays a part, the pro has a pretty large sensor for a phone.

This isn’t surprising, the revanced subreddit moderation was pretty toxic.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

What happened? Why did github block them?

Helium was interesting, but they locked it down so you can only use their proprietary hardware for access points, it seems kinda scammy.

IPFS is used by several archive projects like Anna’s archive and libgen.

Meshtastic is a distributed local mesh network for text messaging.

I guess it’s very “on brand” for the devs of a privacy project to be extremely paranoid.

For OS comparission

It’s worth noting that graphene doesn’t have automatic calls recording, and the Devs have been weirdly aggressive about deleting and banning people that ask for it.

Probably a Huawei.

lol, I’m leaving it.