It shouldn’t be.

Naming an AI tool after a god of mischief seems like tempting the fates. 😆

This isn’t the first project like this, motionEye OS has been around for years.

This is my take too.

People were probably making the same jokes in the early mainframe era of computers.

How many tokens does laughing use?

Why?

Nobody wants that high a resolution photo of themselves. It’s doubtful the lens will even resolve that kind of detail on the tiny sensor.

Still only a 1/1.12-inch sensor, which is smaller than the current x8 ultra.

Honestly I’d prefer they just made it a little thicker and stuck a Sony rx100 style collapsible zoom on it.

To be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.

Of course that could just be what they want us to think.

I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?

I suspect onlyoffice will win this one

I’m sceptical tbh, their interpretation of the AGPL seems questionable. The specific wording in the AGPL they’re relying on for their logo preservation term is:

Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it

IMO a logo isn’t attribution, and even if it was there’s no way it could be considered reasonable to require it if they don’t allow you to use it.

Again? They forgot to tell the Serbs the F117 was invisible

There’s some irony in that sponsor block has to block four segments of the video.

Grapheneos are also against allowing users root access, which is fine on PCs.

The sensor size also plays a part, the pro has a pretty large sensor for a phone.

This isn’t surprising, the revanced subreddit moderation was pretty toxic.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod