There’s been such incredible work to get things like this working over the past decade. I remember trying to build my own phone back then and the idea of running open software in the user space of your cellular modem was just not a thing.
Do we have any actual documentation of anybody who might be called a ‘gimp’ actually being offended by the name?
You want documentation that gimp is offensive? Go call your boss a gimp. They’ll give you some documentation. Feel free to share it here.
Gimp does not refer to people with movement disabilities. It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program.
Pretending to not understand when an acronym spells a word is a new one to me. Maybe you should be writing bill names for congress.
Or is this just more performant bullshit?
I dunno about you, but last time I used it, gimp was pretty performant.
See? That’s me intentionally misunderstanding something obvious in order to ignore a point you’re making. See how transparent and ineffective it is?
I hope they really commit to this. Keep gimp as an option for the obstinate among us, but make wlbr the default. Gimp is, even to people who don’t recognize it as a slur, an informal and rude word and it makes it hard for people who already don’t care about open source to not just dismiss it out of hand when they hear that name.
I have been a staunch advocate of open source software at my company and I promise you the vast majority of people do not know what gimp is.
DHH was too distracted by all the scary people of color in London to worry about security.
CW on that link for bigotry, false statistics, and thinly veiled fascist screeds.