

Totally agree. At the moment the Meta involvement is tolerable, but all it takes is a couple of forced ads or intrusive personal information demands.


Totally agree. At the moment the Meta involvement is tolerable, but all it takes is a couple of forced ads or intrusive personal information demands.


Meta Quest was the last innovative games console.


Leveraged buy outs are usually at least 50% debt.


It’s only about 20% debt.


Can dumb flip phones provide Internet hotspots?


For a AAA game Unreal 5 seems like a reasonable choice for an engine because you have access to Epic Games devs.


Or 1 tech need has containerised 100,000 instances of Linux and is turning them on and off.


Roses are red, Violets are teal.


There are other stakeholders, like regulators and shareholders.


Crypto payments is one solution.


Or use cryptocurrency more


What if talented artists use AI to enhance their original work?


E.g. Does using Intellisense need to be declared?


Thanks. I wasn’t familiar with the abbreviation and of course Google offered no insights.


What’s “short” about the short-sightedness, though?
Gamepass attacks the developers, not the consumers.


The only part of the gamepass that is monopolistic is the friends network it creates.


The only thing diferentianting them from Apple now is the pricing, which hasn’t reached outrageous levels ( yet ).
Software is priced at Apple levels.


Customers will use traditional money transfers to send money to a digital Exchange and in return receive (anonymized) digital cash. Customers can use this digital cash to anonymously pay Merchants. Merchants can redeem the digital cash for traditional money at the digital Exchange. As Merchants are not anonymous, they can be taxed, enabling income or sales taxes to be withheld by the state while providing anonymity for Customers.
The digital exchange seems to be centralised.
They are sold at a loss, so you are technically stealing from Zuckerberg directly.