I actually finished this recently, and to me, the old abilities were almost completely irrelevant. There are legitimately times where you might think that wonderwing is the solution to something, but arbitrarily is programmed to not work.

I still really like BT, and even prefer it over the first in some aspecta. However, it is a perfect example of how powerups were implemented poorly back then (and even today). Instead of powerups enhancing the core gameplay loop, they are just keys to solve shallow puzzles. “Oh, there’s a crack in the wall? Shoot it with a grenade egg.” This is why Mario games have much more emphasis on evolving gameplay through level design rather than character abilities.

TV is the biggest waste of time. I enjoy some shows, but I can acknowledge that a lot of it really is just something to fill time rather than “art.” I’ve cut back my TV and YouTube consumption a lot, and it enables me to do a lot more non-passive hobbies. Worst case scenario I read or game, which I consider a much better use of my time.

Ideally there is a twist where they all turn out to be toxic, and pest control-senpai clears them out.

Or you coukd just use Arch without installing an AUR helper?

I tried the same user, and it worked for me just now. Thanks for working on this project!

Just fyi, I tried one your instance. Searched a user, clicked a result, and got an error.

Error

./app.lua:134: attempt to concatenate field 'username' (a nil value)

Traceback

stack traceback:
	./app.lua:134: in function 'handler'
	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:185: in function 'resolve'
	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:216: in function <...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214>
	[C]: in function 'xpcall'
	...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214: in function 'dispatch'
	/apps/kittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/nginx.lua:231: in function 'serve'
	content_by_lua(nginx.conf.compiled:92):2: in main chunk

Star Fox Zero. Sure, the story was a repeat of old game, but the gameplay was not. The controls needed more polish, but ultimately I thought the gameplay was great. I actually didn’t mind the motion controls. Most of what people complained about didn’t bother me or felt overblown.

In vim you can make some changes to a file, close vim, and then reopen the files, and then undo your changes, i.e. your undo history persists across sessions.

I use helix part-time but am forced to go back to neovim a majority of the time for a few reasons:

1. no persistent undo
2. no ctags and cscope (some C/C++ projects don’t work well with clangd)
3. niche plugins (e.g. I just found a neovim plugin that gives me a way to run ipynb files in-editor)

If 1 and 2 got fixed, I’d be a full time helix user

If you are talking about the Fennec browser (i.e. Firefox on android), this link is not pointing to that.

Thank you for the clarification. Very cool project!

I’m not really an OS guy, so forgive me if this question has an obvious answer. When a thread migrates, it keeps its stack and register, thus any data contained within this can be used in the destination process (correct me if I’m wrong). Thus sending a message could be as simple as migrating a thread and having that thread copy data from its registers or stack memory to the current process’s memory space. However, how does the thread find process-specific addresses and handles (e.g. a mutex)? For example, I’m picturing a scenario where you are implementing an MPI library and want to use thread migration to send (small) messages from one local process to another. The thread orchestrating the send simply loads the data from memory and migrates, but how will it know where to store the data to? Would there need to be a data structure stored in a fix offset in memory that contains the destination address of the receiving process?

I think you have it backwards. Coding games is complicated, and that’s why AI can’t be used to code them effectively.

I’ve been playing Sekiro lately. While it’s not generally on the top of “immersive games” lists, I find it immersive because of how cool the gameplay makes you feel. When you are just completely focused on timing each parry and reading the attacks of your enemy, it makes me feel like I’m actually in the game doing these feats. Combine that with the fact there are few cutscenes and little dialogue, and I’d say it feels pretty immersive.

Biggest con of KDE + Krohnkite (to me) is no text-based config. I really have no desire to pour through the GUI to set up all my keybinds. I’ve tried this setup before, and honestly I mostly like it. However anytime I want to change something I just hate having to click through a menu with my mouse. The search bar helps, but often you’ll spend a lot of time guessing what the devs decided to name a setting. I went back to Sway and have no regrets. Though I’ll admit I wish there was something that was basically Sway with the benefits you mentioned here.

I don’t really see how what you detailed in your summary connects to your thesis. How are things like more registers and less cycles for branches related to using RISC over CISC? It reads more like the microarchitecture of the MIPS is better rather than the approach of the ISA.

I guess your battery isn’t overheating?

I personally recommend Multi Launcher, which is KISS with just a few more features that stay out of your way if you don’t want them

kitty. The ssh kitten is enough reason to use it. I work ob a lot of different systems that require OTP. Using the ssh kitten I can type the OTP once and can spawn new terminals that ssh and cd to the remote direvtory without logging in again. Obviosly the tabs and window panes are are a must too. There’s tons of other useful features that I like, like using hints to select nunbers, filenames, urls, etc in the terminal output.

Isn’t that how all physical media works?