cycles is hilariously usable on weak hardware (though faster hardware is definitely desirable), I tried it on my Intel hd4000 and it somehow works
cycles is hilariously usable on weak hardware (though faster hardware is definitely desirable), I tried it on my Intel hd4000 and it somehow works
wireless keyboards? a good wireless keyboard is more expensive than old thinkpads in my region ._.
the wiki download thing is so nice
typing on phones are so painful…
buy a $50 thinkpad and spare yourself from the pain
tried pmos with plasma mobile but the browsers were buggy because of my SOC having bad graphics acceleration support in the mainline kernel
you won’t need a dedicated monitor if you use Looking Glass
passive/active are just 2 modes you can select between and active is simply better so for me there’s literally 0 problems
scrcpy?
afaik it’s just the msi pro -a z690/z790 boards
yeah i play ksp and rainworld with coreboot+disabled ME thinkpad t430 and it’s fine (coreboot has no performance penalties)
the only thing coreboot broke in my instance was the passive (cpufreq) powersave cpu scaler for my cpu, but I could just switch to the active (intel_pstate) powersave cpu scaler which is better anyway
are there modern desktop motherboards/chipsets/bioses that let you disable ME though? the z690/z790 are the only ones that I know can run coreboot (ignoring laptop motherboards), but I thought that still had to run ME?
waydroid (if you don’t install a wayland based de)
The statistic isn’t saying that 50% of Linux gamers use steam, it’s saying that Linux gamers are ~1/2 as likely to use steam for games when compared to gamers on other platforms. these are very different things.
~50% of Linux gamers using steam is only true if you assumed every gamer on the other platforms used steam
btw i hate the term ‘gamer’ but it’s just convenient to use here :(
so a disproportionately large amount (2x) of Linux gamers don’t use steam? that doesn’t sound right to me with how good steam is on Linux
debian packages will work on debian based distros usually, etcetc
fedora calls their kedoras and ludoras “spins”, but I haven’t used fedora so can’t say how good they are
basically there’s the big 3 (debian, arch, fedora) and everything else is just them with presets (ui, drivers, etc)
debian uses apt, arch uses pacman, fedora uses dnf for packaging, so packages (app executables) aren’t intercompatible and so you usually have some apps that aren’t available on on or the other
usually debian had everything, arch has everything with workarounds, idk about fedora
anyway the tree is like:
debian
fedora
arch
with DEs you should see which ones you like by testing them out, if you get the debian netinstaller you can select however many you want in the install process and you can switch between them at boot with the dropdown menu in the login prompt
Honestly build quality matters more than specs if you’re not gaming in my opinion, that’s why old thinkpads are so popular
I personally got burned by a shitty modern laptop because I only looked at the specs and nothing else
I’m talking about things like:
These things are harder to research but they’re imo way more important than specs
could you elaborate on why?
It’s really disappointing seeing Russian contributors being disrespected like this, the regime that rules Russia wasn’t entirely their fault, and allegiance, nationality, and ethnicity are all clearly different things
Also, wouldn’t a state sponsored Russian hacker pretend to be from the US or something anyway? No way they’d contribute code as a Russian, that’d just increase others’ suspicion
I agree with Linus a lot too but I strongly disagree here. I hope he’s just being made to say this because of government policies
ig support is a big issue but I use sway on old computers and it runs really smooth
I get that you might want to stick to your favorite desktop though
I’m dumb, it was prolly running on my i7-3632qm because cycles needs dGPUs for gpu acceleration
it’s still a 12yo processor though