You create a (self-signed) CA certificate, put its certificate as the client ca in your web server.

Then you can create certificates using this CA that you distribute to your devices, only devices that have a certificate signed by your CA are allowed to connect.

see systemd.unit(5), systemd.service(5), systemd.socket(5), systemd.device(5), systemd.mount(5), systemd.automount(5), systemd.swap(5), systemd.target(5), systemd.path(5), systemd.timer(5), systemd.slice(5), systemd.scope(5) systemd.link(5), systemd.netdev(5), systemd.network(5) and honorable mentions podman-systemd.unit .container, .volume, .network(…again), .kube, .image, .build and .pod

…they base it on how tiktok looks, which is why this article is about how good the display is by measuring brightness, fps, etc.

Well, on linux I’d use systemd’s resolved which would listen on localhost:53 (it would also point resolv.conf there) and then set resolved’s uplink server to your custom port. I don’t have the exact config in mind but it seems to support custom uplink ports(“expects IPv4 or IPv6 address specifications of DNS servers […] optionally take a port number separated with “:”[…]”)

Edit: found this: https://en.opensuse.org/Network_Management_With_Systemd

Just set the DNS server to localhost:1053 for the nas?

Use -B instead.

Sets Advanced Power Management feature. Possible values are between 1 and 255, low values mean more aggressive power management and higher values mean better performance. Values from 1 to 127 permit spin-down, whereas values from 128 to 254 do not. A value of 255 completely disables the feature.)

Hasn’t ended yet, as soon as we reach 75% the simulation will end.

Define “sandboxed”

Application can only access a limited part of the system? = use flatpak or build a container/VM image using the nix pkgs.

Application can be uninstalled completely and has separate libraries? I prefer nix.

Especially since they don’t talk about how they secure the local data

They don’t because they don’t

All the data you import is indexed in a SQLite database and stored on disk organized by date, without obfuscation or anything complicated.

Probably because this is still in early alpha and “the schema is still changing”.

How does mergefs compare to btrfs and bcachefs in using multiple partitions?

Drives connected to usb have an unstable connection in my experience, this is very annoying and gets worse with hubs.

RAIDs reduce the time a system is offline and reduce data loss, if a drive fails and you can afford to wait for the new disk and the backup to restore, and have regular backups that ensure no important data gets lost (though remember the data added between backups may be lost) then you don’t need a RAID.

I don’t use RAIDs cause if my disk fails then I can stomach the 2-4 days it takes to buy a new one and restore the backup

Very important: use S.M.A.R.T and a filesystem with checksums to make sure you’re not backing up corrupted data and know to get a new one

For encryption at rest you may want to look at clevis and tang, though you need a server in your home network for this to work. The client (with clevis) then decrypts the disk at boot if it can reach the server (tang). The server can’t decrypt the data without the client secret and the client can’t decrypt it without the server public key.

Don’t know what your server could be though, maybe a router with custom firmware?

You should also look into cloud storage/rclone, that way you can automate your backups more and reduce the need for manual intervention.

I use rclone and restic to automatically backup my servers daily which takes a few seconds most of the time due to them being incremental backups.

Would this even cause a kernel panic? I think this just causes a userland “panic”

You need a phone, tablet, or other device that’s been rooted.

Damit

It doesn’t though? IANAL but as far as I can tell you can fork, modify and redistribute it as long as you provide the source code to your users.

It’s AGPL-3.0 so… https://www.tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-affero-general-public-license-v3-agpl-3-0

For now

That’s not Firefox forcing you to update, you had Firefox open while you (/your package manager) was updating Firefox and after the update was done Firefox needs to be reopened. To prevent this you just have to …not update Firefox while it is running.

But those only have a short life, they don’t get many updates iirc.

Can’t you edit it?