

Gotta provide details. Don’t leave us hanging.
I’ll do this later…
Gotta provide details. Don’t leave us hanging.
Yeah I use software to make my life easier. Not saying it isn’t worth learning but time is limited.
I’ll check this one out. I don’t see any documentation on it so I don’t know if they can sync with my banks.
Downloading this
No Firefly doesn’t do it. I can’t track individual securities or assets only total values of an account. I wouldn’t know about any gains or losses nor total shares owned.
So that actually doesn’t do what I want. It will record buying and selling of securities but only as if it were like making purchases or payments in a credit card or bank account. It doesn’t keep track of the value of the security or any other asset. For example, I have a Roth account and it has a couple hundred shares of an index fund in it. Actual will only show that I spent several thousand on that index fund (listing it’s name in the notes) but not the number of shares I bought and at what price at the time of purchase. I won’t be able to track gains or losses for each security, only as a whole of the entire Roth. Actual doesn’t do what I want it to do and I don’t know enough TypeScript to contribute.
Did they do some corporate espionage on Boston Dynamics?
Oh this looks promising.
Well I can get the logs in Seq. I don’t know how to process the logs that come in so they are at the right level, timestamp, message, etc. Guess I look into it tomorrow…
Yeah but the thing is I have it set up to read the logs being sent out from my Docker containers. Even though I’ve set the containers to output using the GELF driver they don’t really do that. The log messages my container send are not in GELF format so I have to find a way to fix that.
I’m not clear in the post I guess so I’ll try to be more clear here.
I’ve done that. I don’t have a formatting issue. The containers I’m trying to get logs from have a formatting issue. They don’t stream their logs in GELF. I am getting the logs but I can’t change the formatting that they send me unless I mess with the code itself.
You could use KeePassXC. Just sync it on your cloud platform whether that be Google cloud or Nextcloud.
The “paper” that OP is referring to is the one they posted a few levels up. It links to a researchgate paper that I believe is associated with the article. Just from a quick look at the paper, which is only 3 pages, they are talking about the design the aircraft uses to mitigate the negative effects that occur at hypersonic speeds. They refer to the Waverider design and modified it by including a High-Pressure Capturing Wing to improve lift. Waveriders are designed to conform to the shockwaves the vehicle produces at hypersonic speeds to reduce the drag from those shockwaves. When designing high speed aircraft you have to design around the shockwaves it will produce. This enhancement seems to improve the lift the vehicle creates at those speeds.
Also you aren’t getting everything right in your arguments. Earlier you stated that scramjets are fighting Newton’s 3rd law which states, “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”. You do understand that all air-breathing engines slows the air down before it gets to the engine. This is usually done during a compression cycle to increase the pressure and density of the air. Turbojet and Turbofan engines do this using compression fans, Ramjets uses a normal shockwave, and scramjets uses a series of oblique shockwaves called a “shock train”. The difference between a scramjet and the other engines is the airflow is subsonic in Turbojet, Turbofan, Ramjet, etc while the air enters the engine at supersonic speeds for scramjets. That’s why its called a SCRamjet, Supersonic Combustion Ramjet. But like OP said the paper doesn’t mention what type of engine was used, only that it was a hypersonic vehicle so it could be a rocket.
How do I understand this? I actually have a degree in aerospace engineering, I’ve worked on scramjets (X-51) for the USAF, and I designed engines for GE Aviation. Your arguments are all wrong.
The X-15 was a rocket propelled aircraft. This is an air breathing aircraft.
I can’t. I use AutoCAD in my side hustle…
Listen man, there’s nothing wrong with loving Windows. Plenty of people do. But you’re in a Linux community. If you don’t like it here then leave. There’s nothing wrong with walking away. No need to have unnecessary stress.
I think the car is called Remington, the two door low rider. I can trick that vehicle out as much as I want. I always keep one around so I can participate in the low rider minigames.
I’d also like to add that Forgejo is working on federation along with GitLab. I think Forgejo will do it first though.
Why are they hosting their code on Github? Switch to Codeberg or maybe self host. And yes I know Github has the most users but they’re dealing with something radioactive.