AI techbros will have you believe that you can solve world hunger, cure cancer

And yet they don’t. Well, we already know how to solve world hunger. Just not a willingness.

Researchers are using AI as an additional tool for discovering new drugs, but the techbros and pharmabros are going to be over charging for any new cures even if they become cheaper to discover.

Remember when CoD bragged about having reactive fish when Mario 64 did it years earlier?

Found it.

You just get forced update while you’re in the middle of work and random settings resets.

Just check his video titles.

Even without it, that snark face he uses for the thumbnails are a very big tell.

Because it’s not legal and no one’s going to develop software for XP. Someone could make and sell security patches for it, but the type of person who still runs XP either doesn’t care enough to buy security patches or it’s running some hardware that isn’t connected to the internet.

There are exactly two games released in the past few years that have XP support, but that was more a flex on the part of the developer then catering to the market. HROT and Zortch are those games if you’re curious.

I once saw a post about Oni, a 2001 Bungie game get deleted from the Bungie subreddit for not being Bungie related.

There’s a few indie shooters I’ve played that are officially EA, but have hours of gameplay in their first play though and are very replayable. Selaco is an absolute joy with 9 hours on the main campaign and 22 hours for 100%. Officially EA with only the first episode out.

Wish they could fix the Halo2 co-op issues, but that’s twenty year old spaghetti code. It would be easier to just host the game on one instance, tunnel the second controller input and stream the perspective.

I just want more of my single player games to have optional co-op. I don’t need co-op mechanics, but if it’s an indie game based on GZDoom, it should ship with co-op. The code for that is very old.

Pump elsewhere.

I was gonna try HD2 when I upgraded my machine, but swore it off when that shit happened.

No. That would be taking money from the parents when they purchase the game. The kids would only be playing the game and so long as there’s no store front in the game, there’s no problem.

Would you ban kids from riding bicycles because stores sell them?

You could just sell the game at a flat cost. You know, like they use to and still do. If you want a “Live Service” game, just sell a DLC/Expansion Pack every few months.

There’s a different timeline where the board also brought back Wozniak, OS X has linux under the hood and all third party software was cross compatible.

I wouldn’t imagine iTunes on Ubuntu, but think if all that annoying office software that keeps workplace from switching to linux was suddenly available?

God, Snow Leopard was peak Apple.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The Chinese have glass hearts. You can see it whenever Taiwan gets mentioned as an independent nation.

Not my problem.

That’s not what a boycott is. If I don’t buy a game because it’s exclusively on Epic, it’s not because I’m taking a moral stance. It’s because it’s invisible to me.

A boycott is when I don’t play Epic/EA/Unisoft/Blizzard-Activism games for the company’s historic shitty behavior.