For just a quick little bit of image, I’d say it would take a very large amount of effort and expenses.

My steam deck is about too small to enjoy NMS. There’s no way I’d want to play it on mobile…

Kind of under sells how much work they’ve done to the Linux kernel themselves when you say it like that.

Even HDMI 2.1 is nearly 5 times the throughput of cat 6.

What do you believe valve can do about your countries shitty gls delivery service? Luke, genuinely curious, because it’s obvious that gls delivery people are stealing your packages.

You joke, but I run localized AI on my cell phone. The game looks very graphically simple, so really, it shouldn’t be too demanding for a smaller AI data set to respond fast enough.

What makes you think that the demo just got massively more popular than expected? This is probably an occam’s razor type of thing.

I’m more curious about how they were planning on structuring the full game to make a profit. Hopefully they’re just planning on using a client side ai, but that would likely make the demo somewhat deceitful.

I have xreal one pro glasses for my steam deck and it is awesome as hell. There’s a little bit of blurriness if you’re trying to read something away from the middle of the screen though.

That’s what I’m saying though. I didn’t have to go back on my phone.

I was able to set it all up and select permanent in one go and had to do nothing after the 24 hours was up?

It took me like 1 minute to do, one time and that was it. I wonder if other phone manufacturers are implementing things differently?

Oh my God. Do you always talk in memes and slang from 10 years ago?

Yes. It affirms that there’s a bunch of fan boys in here that are parroting off what they heard from other fan boys and that there is nothing from valve saying they needed the same spec to make a streaming only system work.

But that isn’t true at all, and I’ve still seen no one from valve actually claim it is true.

But that would have been in response to non streaming, where the headset handles everything. I’m talking about non streaming.

Several people around here keep claiming valve said the hardware in it was pretty much the same hardware needed for a streaming only design, but no one has actually been able to provide a source of them saying it, and it sounds like BS in a rumor mill at this point. Especially because it doesn’t make any sense.

*Edit: See. Silent downvotes and no links of anyone from valve claiming that pretty much these specs were required for a streaming only system.

Where do they say this? I don’t know why that much ram and processing and storage would be required for just the streaming and fov stuff.

Few issues. One, as stated explicitly. Don’t need 6dfov. Only 3dfov. Also, your reviews are old as heck. Firmware updates have completely changed how well they work. If I screen lock in place it stays fantasticly. You’re looking at reviews and data from before firmware version 1.9.

The ram could be cut in half and the storage could drop to 16GB. Would have saved probably $350 at this point.

You vastly overestimate the amount of ram and storage and OS required for data exchange and foveated streaming.

I own xreal one pro glasses. They show that your 2nd and 4th point are non issues that can be done with extremely limited on device processing power and no cameras or extra head tracking. The xreals do a fantastic job of those.

The only issue with the xreals is that they aren’t wireless. Still fantastic for games using my steam deck, but not much of a point in using them to sit right in front of my desktop.

No they did not.

You definitely do not. How much processing power do you think is in a Chromecast dongle? Lol

I’d like a cheaper gutted version. I just want the dedicated wifi dongle and an ar screen with 3DfoV so I can play games from my steam deck or PC wirelessly on virtual big screen. I don’t need the device as it stands with play alone features and all the built in ram and storage and vr 6dfov or even the passthrough camera.