Torvalds rejected the merge, and that’s pretty much what he said - no one is using bcachefs.

There’s no reason for a “fix” to be 1k+ lines, these sorts of changes need to come earlier in the release cycle.

Think of the poor shareholders!

Technically, isn’t this a different thing? Genuinely asking.

There could be a license that forbids use (sort of like the CC no commercial use license) but still allows the code to be reviewed publicly, no?

I don’t know if this recaps the situation accurately, to be honest.

Sounds like the publisher is complaining about some article that’s trying to use the game as a reference on why early access can be a bad thing.

I don’t see how the gamers are an issue though. They will expect what you tell them to expect, this is something for the publisher to manage, and I don’t even think this is a problem for Manor Lords.

All of it just seems like news sites trying to come up with their clicks.

Not the companies. But some anonymous whistleblower? Sure

Because they didn’t come out saying they won’t enable ads. They just quietly renamed the toggle to say something else, and that is shady AF. Why are you trying to spin it positively?

This is hilarious stuff.

In a wonderful example of the importance of epeen, people in heated arguments over there have released classified documents just to prove they’re right.

You have a link here for leaked docs for a British Challenger II tank, but its not the only case.