ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · 3 months agoWhat have I done?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1191arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1188arrow-down1imageWhat have I done?lemmy.mlColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · 3 months agomessage-square59linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCoki91@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoYeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
minus-squarefurry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoi could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
minus-squarejuipeltje@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoI don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.
Isnt elogind part of systemd?
Yeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
i could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
I don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.