• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why would anyone pay for the service? Having a “name” is free, and that dumb worldcoin only works for people. It can’t work for governments or businesses.

    ActivityPub is actually a good way to authenticate things. If an organization vouches for something they can post it on their server and it can be viewed elsewhere.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      ActivityPub is actually a good way to authenticate things. If an organization vouches for something they can post it on their server and it can be viewed elsewhere.

      AP has some pretty big issues when it comes to moving servers, expiring and re-purchased domain names, and other such edge cases. Servers either blindly accept new keys after a certain time, or are vulnerable to enabling key ransoming after hacks (the reason HKPK went nowhere).

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the idea of WorldCoin is to have a “wallet” linked to a single physical person, then you can sign any work with your key, that you got by proving you are a real person.

      IMHO, the coin part is just a hype element to get people to sign up for the password part.

      As for ActivityPub, I don’t see how it helps with anything. An organization vouching for something, can already post it on their web, or if they want a distributed system, post it on IPFS.