ruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square124linkfedilinkarrow-up1150arrow-down114
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square124linkfedilink
minus-squaremilagemayvary@mstdn.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month ago@ruffsl As much as I enjoy ease of use via package management, I prefer AppImage. Although I have more flatpaks, the apps I do have under appimage tend to crash less often compared to flatpaks. If an app is available as a native package, 10 times out of 10 will go for the native package I however, would prefer a system without flatpak & snap. :tux:
@ruffsl
As much as I enjoy ease of use via package management, I prefer AppImage.
Although I have more flatpaks, the apps I do have under appimage tend to crash less often compared to flatpaks.
If an app is available as a native package, 10 times out of 10 will go for the native package
I however, would prefer a system without flatpak & snap. :tux: