I know that Linux is more secure than Windows and normally doesn’t need an antivirus, but know myself I’m gonna end up downloading something at some point from somewhere on the internet, and it would be good to be prepared. So, which antivirus would you recommend for Linux (Mint specifically) just to double up on security?

  • notarobot@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That is an old myth. There are less viruses for Linux because there are less users. But if you do things like install priated games, you have the same risk as on windows

    • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Brodie Robertson made a video about malware which pretends to be a pdf but is actually just an executable with a .pdf file extension. So if you double click it, you get pwnd. I think some desktop environments ask you for confirmation before running such thing but I would not count on it.

      So we even have an example of Linux specific malware.

      • KaninchenSpeed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        It shouldn’t even be able to run it, because the x permission bit is missing. As far as I know binaries can’t include icons on linux, so it would look different too.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Thank you. I lived through the “Macs can’t get viruses” bullshit. Try being a teacher in a school with 200 Macs and find out how real that claim is. Yeeeeesh lol… two weeks after fresh imaging and new semester starting 50% of the machines would be completely b0rked

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      not necessarily, you would still be running the virus under wine, which will probably not work as intended.

      • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Wine is not an emulator. It’s not sandboxed either. If you can do it as a user, a program running in wine can do it too.

        There’s nothing stopping a piece of malware from crawling your disk for sensitive information, or encrypting your files for ransom.

      • TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Hard disagree - the point is a decade ago there wasn’t enough Linux market share for bad actors to target Linux. Proton is a compatibility layer, which while technically being a sandbox, it isn’t designed around security the way a browser sandbox is. It would not be hard for a virus embedded in a made-for-windows program to identify that it’s actually a proton sandbox, then deploy a Linux-specific payload (assuming the malware designer gave it some forethought for that situation). Heck - there’s plenty of viruses that do their work in scripting languages that don’t care what OS you’re running on.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          we might see such malware one day, but i don’t think this has ever been done in the wild just yet.