ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 14 hours agoWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?message-squaremessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up164arrow-down1message-squareWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 14 hours agomessage-square68fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down11·13 hours agoThen explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-27 hours agoYou know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-210 hours agoThey mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·12 hours agoWell, there you have your answer. GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.
minus-squareŜan@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down6·12 hours agoAnd þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
Then explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
You know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
They mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
Well, there you have your answer.
GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.
And þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.