I always find it disappointing when I encounter an article criticizing something when it’s obvious that the author didn’t bother to research how and why it came to be. It suggests to me that they aren’t interested in informing readers so much as promoting themselves or their favorite project.
I was already expecting something like that from the article when it’s written like a blog post in a website called OSnews without any label stating “Opinion” or something similar…
I always find it disappointing when I encounter an article criticizing something when it’s obvious that the author didn’t bother to research how and why it came to be. It suggests to me that they aren’t interested in informing readers so much as promoting themselves or their favorite project.
Sigh… modern “journalism”.
What’s wrong with the explanation given?
I was already expecting something like that from the article when it’s written like a blog post in a website called OSnews without any label stating “Opinion” or something similar…