Recent news revealed that Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek has been investing heavily in military tech companies, which adds another ethical layer to a platform already criticized for how little it pays musicians !

Spotify only pays artists about $3–5 per 1,000 streams, using a pro-rata model that directs most money toward major stars… By contrast, Qobuz (≈$18–20 per 1,000 streams) and Tidal (≈$12–13) pay far more fairly!

However Tidal is far from ethical. Most of its revenue is controlled by private investors and founders and small artists still earn very little…

More fair-minded platforms like Bandcamp, Resonate, Ampled, or SoundCloud’s fan-powered royalties prioritize musicians over investors.

With these more ethical alternatives available, why do we keep using Spotify?

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I assume that depends on the contract they have with their label, but usually it’s a way for them to earn more.

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Are most artists still aligned with labels these days? I was under the impression that there’s been a massive shift to going independent.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Its standard across the industry. Artists get paid very little in per unit sales of media.

      The bulk of money they earn comes from tours (which they cover the bill for, and cut some of the profits from), and merch (which they take the largest cut from).

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s the standard, yes. And the solution is to pirate their music instead? But seriously, why do they even bother with labels then? Don’t get me wrong, I’d like for them to be better paid and for streaming services to allocate bigger cut to them, however, piracy doesn’t help with this at all. Usually it’s just an average Joe excuse to not pay anything at all.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Almost all of my collection was pirated in college (it didn’t help that someone stole my 96 CD binder from my car). Once I was making OK money and paid downloads became a thing, I slowly rectified that. It was hard to find electronic music any other way in the '90s.

        • Deyis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But seriously, why do they even bother with labels then?

          Labels provide the upfront capital for things like recording studios, distribution (traditionally, less so nowadays when there’s not a physical product to distribute), publicity, marketing, live shows, etc in exchange for a percentage and usually with a contract that the artist will make X many albums with them.

          Although things are slowly changing, you are unlikely to be doing huge tours at sold out venues and getting your songs played on the radio unless you have the substantial money to do so in the first place.

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Wait … people still listen to the radio?

            “Here’s a shitload of ads and someone in Cincinnati choosing what hundreds of stations play.”

            • Deyis@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Depends on where you live, I suppose. Where I am, you can’t have someone hook up their phone to a bluetooth speaking to play the world’s most tame Spotify playlist but they will absolutely have the radio on at all times.