• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Google is not restricting anyone’s access to the internet, nor is it stopping nakedcapitalism from publishing its articles.

    Your logic might even make sense if Google wasn’t a giant monopoly that has oversized influence over the internet. Not only is Google able to directly influence what sites get ad revenue, but it also uses an opaque algorithm that serves their profit interest to decide what people see.

    It sounds like I’ve explained to you precisely what my issue is in ten different ways here, and it’s like talking to a wall. So, I’m going to stop here.

    • putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Of course, it’s possible that Google has paired its withdrawal of advertisements with a lower rating in search results. Do you have any evidence of that happening, or is it pure supposition, like your hypothetical socialist cooperatives?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What I actually said was that these are two different ways Google suppresses content based on its own interests. Meanwhile, quite hilarious of you to think that socialist cooperatives are hypothetical. Go read up on Mondragon and Huawei as a couple of examples. It’s gonna blow your mind.