While I agree with the main message, I’ll be one to say you are a hypocrite. Code doesn’t have to be art for the use without consent to be wrong. Arguing that way is the same as when people say that using AI to generate images is fine because they have the idea but not the skills to execute it.
Either way you are diminishing someone’s else work because you find this tool useful to achieve the results you want.
It’s good to see Linux Mint still going strong. One of the easiest distros to get started with, in my opinion. My family has been using it for years without issues
No, I was not talking about the parry mechanic by itself, I was talking about how it overshadowed the other mechanics because of how strong it was.
But see, that’s the issue that I’m talking about. You say the game felt as a mix of rhythm game and pattern memorization. There’s no mention of the RPG mechanics there, because the parrying overshadowed it.
I wouldn’t say it was fine in E33. It was too strong compared to other mechanics, to the point you can pratically ignore making your characters stronger as long as you can parry perfectly.
Slop kiddies, that’s what the developper called them
I can’t imagine myself doing that either, but I’ve seen that happen so often that it’s just disheartening. I’ve asked for explanation of code in PRs and got “idk, the AI generated that” way too many times, and that’s from professional software engineers, people who should know better. The corner-cutting is just too much for me
Edit: typo