blendOS v4 released: Arch Linux, made immutable, declarative and atomic - blendOS
blendos.co
Arch Linux made declarative, immutable and atomic.
  • magikmw@lemm.ee
    39·
    6 months ago

    Interesting. Do they point to arch repos or provide their own like Manjaro? I haven’t thought about a rolling release atomic distro before.

    • rs2009@infosec.pubOPEnglish
      81·
      6 months ago

      Just the Arch repos with an additional repository (similar to EndeavourOS), so AUR packages do work as intended and are in fact officially supported.

      (disclaimer: blendOS dev here)

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.netEnglish
        2·
        6 months ago

        I used to Arch, now I’m on ublue-kinoite with an Arch distrobox. Is there a reason to consider switching? (actual genuine question, not trolling)

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      6·
      6 months ago

      Just wanted to add that OpenSUSE MicroOS uses Tumbleweed repos by default, so I’m fairly sure that’s an atomic rolling release too. Not 100% sure, though.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      51·
      6 months ago

      *Fedora Atomic

      Its a huge bundle of tons of variants, likely 40 or so, if you take everything that uBlue, wayblue and secureblue produce

      • pukeko@lemm.eeEnglish
        7·
        6 months ago

        And that’s without counting the roll-your-own variants. uBlue has been a remarkable project.

        • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
          41·
          6 months ago
          • Fedora Atomic has been a remarkable project ;D

          Fedora builds the container images, even though they themselves use OSTree remotes. There is a Change Proposal to change to them.

          This means they continuously build the container images without even using them!

          Only because of that the standard container workflow actions (they use an Ubuntu container!) even work. But for sure their tooling is very useful

  • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
    22·
    6 months ago

    I just wanted to say this is all very confusing. I barely installed Ubuntu on my laptop as a daily driver mostly due to the MS Recall debacle. It’s fine, it’s great. However, reading all the Linux Lemmy posts makes me feel like I’ll never understand. I know all these words and what they mean, just not in an OS context.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      33·
      6 months ago

      Think about it this way: going onto Linux communities and listening to what people say can be like listening to car mechanics chat.

      But do you need to know what all of that stuff means to drive your car? Nah. But that info could come in handy, if you wanted to modify your car or something like that.

      You don’t need to know what Wayland/X11, PipeWire, GTK4/Qt6, or anything like that is, in much the same way you don’t need to know what PowerShell, Event Viewer, NT kernel, or registry are to use Windows.

    • shrugal@lemm.ee
      23·
      6 months ago

      Welcome to the Linux community. :)

      You will probably never understand everything about Linux and all of its included and associated systems. That’s completely fine, no one does! That’s why we are many, and it’s what asking for advice or help is for. You can just learn whatever interests you at your own pace, and know that there will always be interesting things you haven’t seen yet.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      17·
      6 months ago

      You probably think of yourself as pretty knowledgeable regarding Windows, but have you ever studied for a Microsoft certification exam? This in depth knowledge is not something the average user needs for his daily usage, but can be interesting to read/know.

    • ikidd@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      6 months ago

      Don’t sweat it. There were people doing advanced things in Windows that would probably have blown your mind as well. It’s just that most people that use Linux just enjoy tinkering for the sake of tinkering so it’s more visible, and Linux lends itself to people doing weird and wonderful things never envisioned by it’s creators.

      You just started on the road, where you stop is entirely up to you. Just know that the view is way more interesting going this route. Take a few pictures on the way.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      7·
      6 months ago
      • repeat the “Don’t sweat it.”
      • Ubuntu is a perfectly fine starting point (the other “beginner distro” that’s commonly recommended is LinuxMint)
      • »AFTER« you become comfortable with what you have:
      • »THEN« take a look at immutable distros
        • “immutable distro” is a catch-all term that embraces several concepts
          • immutable – the root filesystem is set to read-only – makes it harder to mess up your system
          • declarative – your hardware and packages and configs are declared in a master configuration file
          • atomic / transactional – updates are checked as they’re applied, if it fails, it gets rolled back to a previous “safe state”
          • container / sandbox – ex. Flatpak or Docker or OCI – apps are isolated in their own sandbox and not allowed to mess up anything else
    • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
      5·
      6 months ago

      It’s fine you don’t have to understand any of these just use the computer normally and you’re good

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      19·
      6 months ago

      😇do you know how to add repos to atp? That’s pretty important, or you may end up installing .dep manually, which I not recommend for people that want a OS that just works

    • geoma@lemmy.ml
      341·
      6 months ago

      don’t worry. this probably isn’t for you… yet… anyway, why did you install ubuntu??? who misguided you? you should have gone linux mint DE, mx linux, Fedora or something like that. Ubuntu was great… 15 years ago. Sorry if I sound too hard… take it with a laugh 😁

      • A Basil Plant@lemmy.world
        471·
        6 months ago

        No. Fuck this shit. Don’t do this.

        It’s already bad when everyone in this community shoves their distro down potential linux-converts’ throats, thereby confusing them even more. Don’t tell (or imply to) freshly converted users that they potentially made a wrong choice.

        TF do you think they’re going to do now? Move to fedora? The commenter above already stated that it was a hassle to install Ubuntu and now you’re telling them to change distros already???

        Ubuntu is still great… compared to Windows. Sure. It may not hold to your ideals. Compared to other distros, canonical may make some questionable choices. BUT THEY DON’T IMPLEMENT A FUCKING RECALL. So it’s fine (for now).

        Ubuntu is fine for newcomers. It has a shit ton of support online and you can easily search questions whose answers are likely to be found within the first few results.

        So stop shoving distros down people’s throats, especially fresh users.

        I know you said:

        Sorry if I sound too hard… take it with a laugh 😁

        It doesn’t come across that way. You come off as a gatekeeper.

        • geoma@lemmy.ml
          11·
          6 months ago

          Ok. Yeah, commenters are right. First of all, congratulations for switching. Enjoy ubuntu as a great first step. If you have issues, consider it might be ubuntu and not linux as a whole. In the future, consider other options like the ones I gave. Sorry for the not-contributing comment.

        • yak@feddit.it
          7·
          6 months ago

          Please, don’t listen to this kind of nonsense and keep using whatever you’re happy with.

          While I personally don’t love Ubuntu, it is a perfectly fine choice and if you’re comfortable with it that’s just great! Period.

          So, congratulations for making this choice and don’t hesitate to ask if you have questions. You’ll find that the Linux community has much more to give than “you shouldn’t use X, use Y because I say so”. Just ignore this.

          Keep it up, enjoy the ride and welcome!

    • starman@programming.devEnglish
      151·
      6 months ago

      I don’t think that this one is as reproducible and declarative as NixOS or Guix.

  • whatsgoingdom@rollenspiel.forum
    15·
    6 months ago

    A very dumb question probably, but I’m new to using Linux so I lack a lot of understanding: I’m on Bazzite atm. Would there be a simple way to switch to blend OS without wiping everything? Like a rebase? Probably not but I figured it’s worth a shot to ask xD

    • Lupec@lemm.ee
      171·
      6 months ago

      No such thing, we all start somewhere! :)

      Anyway, you could in fact do that if you were thinking of trying out other Fedora Atomic images such as Silverblue and whatnot (see also the ublue page listing tons of others, including your bazzite!). This uses different tooling, so unfortunately not in this case.

    • rs2009@infosec.pubOP
      13·
      6 months ago

      Ooh, not just yet (in essence, it’d be hard to migrate over from the system used in Fedora Atomic to that used by blendOS) :( We’re working on a migration script for users from regular ole’ Arch Linux, though.

      (disclaimer: blendOS dev here)

    • dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml
      9·
      6 months ago

      bazzite is fedora based? If so, your filesystem is btrfs and your /home is a subvolume, same as your / (root). you can install a new operating system in a btrfs subvolume (e.g. /blendosroot), then have systemd-boot or grub mount it as root and mount your existing home from it.

      sadly, there’s no noob-friendly way to achieve this, but if you’re adventurous, you have enough search terms to make it happen.

      • whatsgoingdom@rollenspiel.forum
        1·
        6 months ago

        Yeah I don’t as in the bazzite installer it’s a real pain to set it up manually (also not allowing you to spread the partitions over multiple drives during the initial setup)

      • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
        1·
        6 months ago

        Is there a guide or any educational material on this? I’m about to swap to Linux (some fedora distro focused on gaming) and I’m interested in potentially one day swapping to arch after I’ve gotten my toes wet. Doing a bit of extra work and planning ahead to make that easier sounds nice.

  • camr_on@lemmy.world
    8·
    5 months ago

    I’m not super clear on what being declarative and atomic means in an OS context. Does it mean there’s a file describing what packages are installed, kind of like nix?

    • governorkeagan@lemdro.idEnglish
      9·
      6 months ago

      I am no expert, please correct me if I’m wrong

      From what I understand, it’s like Nix but Arch based. The /system.yaml file contains all of the packages installed on the system.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        82·
        6 months ago

        Also it’s the worst when you download an operating system and you realize that it’s mutable

        You’re like “oh no I did not want the mutable one I wanted the immutable one”

        I know what all words mean

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      6·
      6 months ago

      It’s new to me, I think it’s saying that your system is built up by you declaring what you want in a file, a single source that everything comes from.

      It’s atomic because each action the system takes is carefully completed rather than bailing out and requiring you to fix something.

      It’s immutable meaning you declare how you want things to be set up and then critical changes stem from those declarations and nothing else. You would obviously generate preferences, save data, etc. but the files that make the system / packages work are carefully locked.

      It’s like the concept of flatpaks + structured system defining + modern common sense OS operations?

  • exu@feditown.comEnglish
    7·
    6 months ago

    I already learnt of blendOS two weeks ago, I think in a discussion of immutable distros.

    Really looking forward to play around with it some more and maybe replace my Arch install with this.

  • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
    6·
    6 months ago

    Does anybody know if configurations are also declarative?

    Basically I want some easy way to spin up something arch linux based with my KDE Plasma settings, pacman hooks, grub configurations etc.

    • rs2009@infosec.pubOP
      9·
      6 months ago

      Oh yep, they are declarative, and that’s what we’ve tried to implement with /system.yaml. pacman hooks and grub configs can be defined through /system.yaml (through a combination of the packages and commands arrays), but Plasma config is per-user and so wouldn’t be possible to declare unfortunately :( you can declare GNOME config though, fwiw

      (disclaimer: blendOS dev here)

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        1·
        6 months ago

        nix has home manager for that, but even then, plasma configs are a huge mess there.

        thanks for the reply and your hard work :)

        • rs2009@infosec.pubOP
          5·
          6 months ago

          oh yep, should’ve clarified, /system.yaml’s, as the name might suggest (lol), for system-wide config only, and GNOME just so happens to support system-wide config (dconf and gsettings overrides); we used to have a utility for declaring config for individual users akin to home-manager in blendOS v3, but dropped it with v4 since that wasn’t used much; still might make a return though :)

          thank you for your support! :)

  • aleph@lemm.eeEnglish
    5·
    6 months ago

    Very intriguing. Is there a wiki or support forum in the works, too?

      • aleph@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        6 months ago

        Follow-up question: I’m in the US and the initial installation is taking forever. Pacman seems to be running at just 60-80 KiB/s when I normally get 5MiB/s. IS there a way to have the installer choose a local mirror before downloading all the packages?

        • rs2009@infosec.pubOP
          3·
          6 months ago

          Oh, blendOS uses cloudflaremirrors.com during installation, which points at the Arch mirror it thinks it closest to you, and installation should be quite fast in North America (the blendOS package repo’s hosted in Germany, but it shouldn’t be too slow and doesn’t host too many packages required for installation). However, I do plan to make that configurable (as an option for users that know what they’re doing, or perhaps through a CLI installer for advanced users), and might implement it in the coming few days.

          (disclaimer: blendOS dev here)

          • aleph@lemm.eeEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            Ok, thanks for the heads-up. I’m running it in a local VM and for some reason my host Arch system is significantly faster at downloading and installing packages than the blendOS guest. Not sure why, but just thought I’d mention it.

            Edit: never mind, I messed up the first installation so had to do-over, and the slow download speed seems to have recovered this time.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    41·
    6 months ago

    Honestly, having a declarative package manager is pretty important.

    Consider the following: We’ve had the transition from Sys V Init to Systemd recently. But what does it actually mean?

    It means, that instead of running a command to start a service, you now flip a switch in a clear, standardized way. The advantage is that you can get a table-like overview over all the services that are currently running. You get an overview, in other words. That is worth a lot because it brings structure and clarity into your system.

    Now, with package management it’s the same way. Instead of running a command to install a package, we should instead give a list of all the packages that we want to have installed, and the package manager should take care of making sure that they are installed. That would improve clarity, because you get a list of all the packages that are installed. It might also increase efficiency if you’re installing many packages, because large parts of the work can be done in parallel. And importantly, you get reproducibility. Imagine you just have a file where it names all the packages that should be installed. You can just take that list and copy it to another machine. Now you’ve cloned your package installations. I guess things like Docker, with their docker files, are kinda already going in that direction. But it would be nice to have support for it in the mainline operating systems.