So I’ve been using Rustdesk with a self hosted server for business and personal use now for some time. However, it is definitely the sketchiest foss software I’ve used. It seems to be based in China but the developers keep lying and saying its in Singapore.

Here is a list if everything I’ve found:

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/14kjvkg/community_consensus_on_rustdesk_with_all_the/

https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/discussions/1159

https://www.reddit.com/r/rustdesk/comments/y230hf/my_rustdesk_client_try_to_communication_with/

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/10ppntj/reminder_about_the_shadyness_of_rustdesk/

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/109tn1i/rustdesk_server_117_supports_ipv6_now_selfhosted/j42pf4m/

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/uurta8/_/

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/y80sw1/as_someone_that_knows_nothing_about_virtualremote/isxvib2/

https://youtu.be/JIAdEGX_sIU

It seems that now the clients and OSS server are completely foss which is good. They also no longer have public servers in China according to them. In the client itself it also now has better defaults so you are less at risk of getting attacked.

It still is sketch but it now is slightly less sketch I guess? Either way its not ideal.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    So your point is that a FOSS application made in China is sketchy by default or what exactly?

    Damn, you Americans are really brainwashed that everything that originates from China is bad.

    You know you are free to use TeamViewer or Anydesk and no one is forcing you to use Rustdesk.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It sound like you are personally offended by this because you are Chinese, but as an European, I share your sentiment. I don’t trust either Chinese, nor American solutions. After all, after Snowden, we know American solutions are systematically compromised.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am not Chinese, I am born and raised in the EU and I am Caucasian.

        I am just irritated that FOSS software is being questioned just because it might have been developed by Chinese programmers.

        And for the record you can’t be sure that any commercial software isn’t compromised or it doesn’t have backdoors, it just makes detecting those backdoors a lot harder.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Foss from places with known APTs are more secure than non-foss too personally. It would be daytime robbery compared to an inside job to implement spyware. It’s been done and should be monitored for though.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Software and hardware from China is known to be compromised on arrival. The CPP is a dangerous authoritarian government and they heavily influence private business in very nasty ways.

      As for Team viewer and Anydesk, they are proprietary and can not be trusted. At least Rustdesk is Libre. The most concerning part about Rustdesk is that they delete issues that question the source of the software or Rustdesk’s potential to be influenced by the CPP.

      • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The US government is a dangerous authoritarian government and they heavily influence private business in very nasty ways.

        • octoblade@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If I am remembering correctly, Australia also has laws that allow the government to force private companies to build backdoors. I think it was the Ass Access Act.

          • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh yeah I’m not denying that.

            I’m just saying its short sighted to take any shots at China when the west are authoritarian themselves.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The difference is that there is SOME accountability in the West and we can, to an extent, influence who leads us, especially in Europe.

              So if flagrant misuse does appear, there’s a much higher risk of it being discovered and of heads rolling in the west.

              Think of the number of exposed scandals in the West and compare that to China.

              And I’m not throwing shit China’s way and thinking the West infallible. I’ve been to China plenty and worked with awesome Chinese people plenty. There’s a lot to love in China.

              But let’s not get lost in whataboutisms. Where would you rather raise your children?!

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The US government is in fact not authoritarian. As for influencing private business that is a real concern but at least here it isn’t illegal to stay private. I can vote for my officials and criticize the government without fear.

          • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The US is especially authoritarian.

            And if you think you actually have a choice in candidates, let alone any good ones you’re sorely mistaking.

            Voter suppression is a widely used tactic to influence votes away from low socio economic areas and black communities.